Skip to content
Subscribe

No, It's Not Fraud. It is Steyer $$$$...

and Maine's biggest story has nothing to do with Graham Platner

The President spent the day after the election on Truth Social calling California a "third-world nation" because Los Angeles takes more than one night to count its ballots. Slow counting isn't fraud. And the actual story has nothing to do with rigged machines.

It's Tom Steyer's $$$$.

Steyer dropped more than $200 million of his own money into the California governor's race that was reportable. He also spent unknown amounts funding the turnout operations of organizations his progressive positioning spoke to, including the Democratic Socialists of America, Our Revolution, the Working Families Party, and labor groups that endorsed his "outsider" candidacy. All perfectly legal.

That's why Karen Bass woke up the morning after election day expecting Spencer Pratt in November and got Nithya Raman instead. CNN's Harry Enten said it plainly: "She wanted to face Pratt. She wanted nothing to do with Raman."

The rules may be worth a debate. But there was no wholesale cheating. There was a billionaire.

Elsewhere, IVN exposed several other stories the national narrative has missed, including:

Check out more stories that go outside the two-sided narrative below.

FEATURED ▶▶▶

It Wasn't Fraud. It's Steyer $$$$.

The conspiracy theory is that California cheated. The reality is that Top Two forced Democrats to fight each other in public.

The President called it fraud. CNN's Harry Enten called that "the dumbest conspiracy theory I have ever heard." The truth is far simpler - and far more revealing. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass was supposed to coast into a second term against a Republican in a city where Democrats outnumber the GOP three to one. Instead, she's facing fellow Democrat Nithya Raman in November, and the reason isn't a rigged count. It's Tom Steyer's money and a primary system that forced Democrats to fight each other in public.

California's Top Two primary doesn't protect incumbents or guarantee partisan outcomes - it makes every candidate earn it. That's exactly why party insiders hate it, and exactly why it works. Read the full breakdown on IVN →

POPULAR ON IVN ▶▶▶

POLL RESULTS ▶▶▶

We Were Right: Becerra Rides Latino Support to Win Primary

The Independent Voter Project poll got it right. While other pollsters spun narratives that didn't hold up, we showed Xavier Becerra surging into a commanding lead well before the results confirmed it - making us the first poll to call his rise and the strength he'd carry with Latino voters, the fastest-growing bloc in the state. As Becerra heads toward a traditional R-vs-D general against Steve Hilton, the "two Republicans will advance" panic looks exactly like the manufactured fear we said it was.

And on the question of open primaries themselves? Those same Latino voters made their position clear: only 22% want to go back to closed partisan primaries.

NEW EPISODE ▶▶▶

Independent Voter Podcast

Fresh off the California gubernatorial primary, Chad, Cara, and Ethan break down why the "Top Two will produce two Republicans" narrative was a manufactured fear - and why it collapsed the moment voters actually voted, with Steve Hilton and Xavier Becerra heading toward a traditional R-vs-D general.

GOING VIRAL ▶▶▶

Flashback: CA Independents Locked Out of Primaries Pre-Top-Two

Remember when California independents were "second class citizens"? Before 2010, political parties got to decide - election by election - whether to even let independents vote in their primaries. In heavily one-sided districts, that meant millions of NPP voters had no real say in who represented them.

Our video showing news coverage of the effort to pass the Top-Two primary has racked up over a million views on Instagram.

NEW: Join the Conversation

Now, when you sign-up for an account on IVN, you can help frame, change, and inform the discussion. In fact, you can submit your own news stories, as long as you follow the simple IVN Etiquette.

SIGN UP NOW

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

No, It's Not Fraud. It is Steyer $$$$...

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us