Skip to content

Critics PROVED WRONG About the “Top-Two” Primary in California (It WORKS)

Political outsiders and independent voters shaped the outcome, debunking the disinformation campaign pushed by establishment party insiders who manufactured a fear narrative about two Republicans potentially advancing.

Critics PROVED WRONG About the “Top-Two” Primary in California (It WORKS)
Image: Four Leading Repeal of Independent Voter Rights. Steve Maviglio, Paul Mitchell, Ron Nerhing, and Carl DeMaio. Image by IVN Staff.

Fresh off the California gubernatorial primary, Chad, Cara, and Ethan break down why the "Top Two will produce two Republicans" narrative was a manufactured fear - and why it collapsed the moment voters actually voted, with Steve Hilton and Xavier Becerra heading toward a traditional R-vs-D general.

They dig into who was pushing that panic and why (fundraising, juicing turnout, and a quiet war on Top Two itself), including the uncomfortable detail that a party chair reportedly asked a leading minority candidate to drop out. Stick around for the bigger question the reform movement keeps dodging - and a pitch for what could come after Top Two. 

This episode is sponsored by the Independent Voter Project and produced by Olas Media. Listen on Spotify or Apple Podcasts

Episode Highlights

In this episode of the Independent Voter Podcast, Ethan, Chad, and Cara break down the California primary election results in real time, with only 57% of expected votes counted. Early results show Steve Hilton leading at 27.8%, followed by Xavier Becerra at 25.4%, and Tom Steyer at 19.5%. 

They highlight how political outsiders and independent voters shaped the outcome, debunking the disinformation campaign pushed by establishment party insiders who manufactured a fear narrative about two Republicans potentially advancing. 

It was deliberate election misinformation designed to suppress competition, drive fundraising, and boost partisan voter turnout.

The Top Two Panic Wasn’t Analysis. It Was Political Manipulation.
California voters did exactly what voters tend to do: they evaluated the candidates, coalesced around viable contenders, and produced a result broadly reflective of the state’s electorate.

The conversation digs deep into election reform, voter rights, and democracy vs. partisanship, centering on California's Top Two nonpartisan primary system. Political elites from both the Democratic Party and Republican Party are attempting to dismantle Top Two— not because it's broken, but precisely because it empowers voters over party bosses

Data from the California State Library shows that since Top Two was approved by voters in 2010, women's representation in the legislature grew by 79%, the state senate became majority women, and Latino and Hispanic representation surged from 37% to 55% of seats. 

It is a striking indicator of how election system reform drives diversity in government and political representation.

The episode also explores next-generation electoral reforms, proposing a potential Top Four or Top Five primary combined with ranked choice voting (RCV) in the general election —a system that is being dubbed More Choice Voting.

How California’s Top Two Nonpartisan Primary Transformed the Legislature
The system Republican and Democratic party insiders want to “undo” produced a legislature where women hold 49 percent of seats, people of color hold 55 percent, and Latinos have reached a third of the body for the first time.

It would eliminate first-past-the-post voting and ensure winners reflect a true voter majority

It’s worth noting that Latino voters — the fastest-growing independent voter demographic — overwhelmingly support open primaries, with 80% favoring the current system over a return to closed partisan primaries. 

Poll: Only 22% of Latino Voters Support Return to Partisan Primaries. Becerra Big Lead for Governor.
A majority of California Latino voters say they want to keep the nonpartisan Top Two primary or modify it to advance more than two candidates to the general election. They don’t want the state to go back to closed primaries.

As election integrity, voting rights, and political polarization dominate national headlines, this episode offers a timely, nonpartisan perspective on reshaping American democracy from the ground up.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

More in Podcast

See all

More from Independent Voter Podcast

See all