Skip to content
Subscribe

JB Pritzker Says Democrats Must Fight—But Dodges the Open Primaries Question

Governor Pritzker frames the Democratic Party divide as "Team Cave" versus "Team Fight," but sidesteps questions about whether this commitment extends to independent voters locked out of primary elections.

JB Pritzker Says Democrats Must Fight—But Dodges the Open Primaries Question
Image: Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker. By Alan Kotok on Alamy. Image license obtained and exclusively used by IVN Editor Shawn Griffiths for editorial purposes only.

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker says the identity crisis in the Democratic Party is between those who cave and those who are willing to fight for the American public, but while he makes the case for being a fighter—the question is: Will this apply to independent voters?

Specifically, for their voting rights in publicly funded and administered elections.

Paul Rieckhoff hosted Pritzker on his podcast, Independent Americans. The two discussed several topics, including the president’s insults at the governor, his rising-star status in the Democratic Party, and the lingering threat of the Insurrection Act dangling over Chicago.

“We’re going to stand up and push back as we did before, and as you pointed out, we won in the Supreme Court about his fight to bring National Guard into the city of Chicago,” Pritzker said.

He added that he does not want the federal government “invading us for purposes other than what is good for the people of our state,” and the administration should not send in troops unless and until state governors ask.

This transitioned into a conversation about the identity crisis within the Democratic Party, as the Democratic Socialists of America continue to rise in influence. But Pritzker says recent events have shown the real divide is between “Team Cave” and Team Fight.”

“You’ve seen so many people who aren’t willing to stand up and push back,” he said.

Pritzker uses the deaths of US citizens in Minneapolis during the ICE deployment earlier this year as an example. He said he told another governor at the time that all Democratic governors should show up in Minneapolis, join protesters, and “make a statement that this is not right.”

“That governor said to me, not exaggerating, ‘you know, I am really not sure that other governors are going to want to do that. How about we have a Zoom call?’ And I thought, really? You’re missing the moment here.”

Rieckoff said he understands the distinction between “Team Cave” and “Team Fight,” but he pressed the governor on what this means for independent voters. Independents want a fighter, but millions of them are locked out of publicly-funded primary elections.

In Illinois alone, over 40% of the electorate identifies as independent, according to L2 Data compiled by the Independent Voter Project.

These voters often fly under the radar in national conversations, but with more governors speaking out in favor of open primaries, like Wes Moore in Maryland and Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania, Rieckhoff asked Pritzker if he would go on the record in support as well.

However, Pritzker immediately shifted the topic to redistricting, saying that what would be better would be a national law that requires independent redistricting commissions to draw more competitive districts.

He even corrected himself when he initially said there should be more competitive primaries, because he believes the focus should be on the general election.

“I believe we should have more competitive primaries—sorry—general elections. But I think the way to do that is to make sure we got districts where there is a chance of someone from either party possibly winning,” Pritzker remarked.

Rieckoff responded from a position of essentially: why not both?

He agreed that the national redistricting bill was long overdue, but he didn’t let Pritzker off the hook on the subject of open primaries. He asserted that it is time for the “players to stop being the referees,” but the parties also need to stop running elections when they get public funding.

“We’re putting public money and using public schools and public election booths to run private primaries where all of us can’t vote,” he said. “All of that seems inequitable. We’re going to challenge it all the way to the Supreme Court and say it is unconstitutional.”

“But there is a rising movement of folks who want to be able to have an equal vote, and until the primaries are truly open and not run by the parties, we’re not going to get that.”

And yet, Pritzker never addressed the issue directly in their conversation.

He talked about how important it is to win over independents and if independent voters want change, they can swing an election or run a candidate of their own (despite his previous observation about the lack of competitiveness in the US).

But he never actually answered the question. Rieckhoff put Pritzker as a “Yes” for independent redistricting reform, but a “TBD” on open primaries. Check out the full interview above.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

More in Open Primaries

See all

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

JB Pritzker Says Democrats Must Fight—But Dodges the Open Primaries Question

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us