Skip to content
Subscribe

Why Conservative Utopias Don’t Work any Better than Liberal Ones

Published:

It turns out that Ayn Rand believed in Utopia too—what she described as the “Utopia of Greed.” This was my big takeaway when I read Atlas Shrugged last year at the not-so-impressionable age of 46. Rand’s heroine, Dagny Taggart, finds this utopia when her plane crashes deep in the Colorado mountains. In "Galt's Gulch," she meets all of the creative and talented people who have been disappearing from society—including the legendary John Galt, the übermencsh über alles who has been convincing all of the superior, productive people of the world to go on strike.

The thing is, though, that these immensely talented artists, inventors, scientists, and industrialists have created nothing less than a pastoral utopia. Brilliant scientists are happily raising pigs and planting small corn crops. World-moving industrialists have set up blacksmith shops. It turns out that this is all that the ultra-rich really want. Money was never an end in itself--just a way for one productive human being to produce the best he can and exchange the value he creates for the best of someone else. Yeah, that’s just how it would work out. I’m sure that, if we could somehow convince Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Donald Trump, Ross Perot, Stephen Hawking, Anthony Hopkins, and Bob Dylan into a hidden valley they would produce a pastoral utopia in a matter of weeks. What does Trump need casinos for when he can milk goats and exchange the milk for indestructible suspenders?

The more I read, though, the more convinced I am that precisely this kind of Utopian thinking lies at the center of much of today’s political discourse. Government, in this version of utopia, is the great downward force that prevents creative people from creating and productive people from producing. If we could just do away with taxes and government regulations, the argument goes, these avatars of excellence would enrich themselves beyond anybody’s wildest dreams and somehow, in the process, save us from our sorry, mediocre selves. Once upon a time, this was known as “anarchism.” Today it goes under the name of “liberty.” But the concept is pretty much the same. And it is every bit as utopian.It is a concept that we must resist, however, for the same reason we must resist it’s opposite:  We just aren’t built for it. Ants, sure. Super intelligent bees, absolutely. But human beings lack one of the key requirements necessary for a perfect society: we, or most of us anyway, are incapable of ever thinking that we have enough.

This is why communism doesn’t work. “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs” sounds really good on paper, but it requires huge numbers of people to work against some of the fundamental assumptions of human nature.

It is also why the untaxed and unregulated capitalism that Ayn Rand favored has always failed to produce anything other than great wealth concentrated in the hands of very few, and a life of hard work with no chance of success for everybody else. This was the case for much of America and Europe in the 19th century, and it was not a society that most people wanted to live in. So we changed it.

Did we get utopia? Of course not. But the societies of America and Western Europe in the second half of the 20th century—with their mixtures of capitalist production and socialist redistribution—produced more productive economies, and more just societies, than the world had ever seen before. And they did it by abandoning the kinds of ideologically pure, but pragmatically flawed utopian assumptions of the previous century.

One of the most important lessons we can learn from the history of the 20th century is that pure ideologies don’t create the kinds of countries that anybody wants to live in--though they all look good on paper. As John Kenneth Galbraith famously quipped, “Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.” Successful societies in the modern era require blended economies, mixed political systems, and a willingness to abandon pure ideological positions in favor of what actually works.

For everybody else, there is the Worker’s Utopia of North Korea and the Libertarian Paradise of Somalia.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Why Conservative Utopias Don’t Work any Better than Liberal Ones

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us