Skip to content
Subscribe

Voter ID and Voter Fraud Do Not Compare

Published:

Voter ID and voter fraud are often linked. But, a popular understanding of voter fraud, people posing as another individual on Election Day, was shown to be "infinitesimal" according to a study conducted by Arizona State University. Today Damon Eris posted an article on dev.us regarding the study and its results. The study covered years 2000-2012 and uncovered that 10 incidences of in-person voter fraud have occurred throughout the country during that time.

Voter fraud in this form would be combatted by requiring would-be voters to produce a voter ID when they attempt to vote. This would minimize the ability of individuals to fraudulently pose as another registered voter. As discussed briefly above, these requirements could disenfranchise 11% of eligible voters across the country. While this is a large percentage of the voting population the threat that is posed is not remotely similar to the disenfranchisement. The threat is that one individual is able to cast an extra ballot because a government-issued ID does not verify their identity. A wrongdoer would be limited by the time the polls are open and the geographic distance between them.

Regardless, the probability of a large group of individuals being able to cast enough fraudulent ballots, by posing as other people is extraordinarily low. When that threat is compared with 11% of eligible voters being disenfranchised by an ID requirement is, the costs of the ID laws severely outweigh the benefits. As the Brennan Center points out, the occurrence of this type of voter fraud is less likely than an individual being struck by lightning.

Voter fraud is a foolish move in the first place for individuals attempting to swing an election. The punishment for federal election fraud is 5 years and a $10,000 fine. The return on the risk is only a single vote.

Linking voter IDs and voter fraud is essentially comparing apples to oranges. If voter fraud at a scale that was remotely proportional to the amount of individuals knowingly disenfranchised by voter ID laws, a much stronger argument would be made for them. What Independents should understand is that the connection between voter IDs and voter fraud as a major threat to democracy is tenuous at best.

For more statistics on Voter ID related disenfranchisement visit the Brennan Center at NYU.

In The Next Segment: What creates the appearance of voter fraud.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Voter ID and Voter Fraud Do Not Compare

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us