Skip to content
Subscribe

Tornado Watch in Kansas

Published:

Last week I traveled to Kansas for an appearance at the Robert J. Dole Institute of Politics at the University of Kansas. Nestled in the hills of Lawrence (seemingly the only hills in this flattest of states), the Institute building is a striking structure, framing a towering stained glass rendering of the American flag.

But for all its modernism, on the path to the main entrance, there is a four-foot stone hitching post from the original Dole ranch. The post is weathered, a clear reminder of the state’s deep agrarian roots, where the prairie was turned to farmland. Image: National Association of Nonpartisan Reformers Executive Director Jim Jonas (left), Independent Voting President Jackie Salit (right)

These roots intertwine with the state’s bloody anti-slavery history. It was known as Bleeding Kansas before the Civil War, and its citizens, especially in Lawrence, shed much blood to keep it a free, rather than slave, state.

The Dole Institute had commissioned Jim Jonas, a former Republican and now the Executive Director of the National Association of Nonpartisan Reformers, to curate and host a series of interviews under the title “Rise of the Independents” with figures in the movement to discuss the prospects for nonpartisan reform and independent politics.

I was among them, the last speaker in the series, and Jim Jonas was an engaging interviewer. Many thanks to the team at Dole for supporting Jim in pursuing these cutting-edge conversations about a new political frontier.

Later that day, perhaps prophetically, Jim and I were invited to visit the studios of Kansas Public Radio to tape a segment of “KPR Presents” with Kaye McIntyre. I say “prophetic” because the Dole Institute is aligned with conservative Republicanism (old-style, pre-Tea Party, pre-Trump) and KPR is aligned with the Democratic liberalism side of things.

The day was shaping up to be a microcosm of America’s political divide, but in this instance, the independents were fully present. Image: National Association of Nonpartisan Reformers Executive Director Jim Jonas (left), Independent Voting President Jackie Salit (right)

Once in the studio, Kaye McIntyre was dogged (truly in the best sense) in trying to unpackage the proposition that independents belong in the body politic and that the playing field should be leveled to make sure their participation matters.

In Kansas, for example, 30% of voters are non-aligned, but the state and the political parties ban these independents from voting in primaries. In a state as “red” as Kansas, most elections are decided in the primary, and so nearly a third of the electorate is marginalized.

Nationally, 44% of voters self-identify as independents. In 2016, over 25 million of them lived in states where you are required to join a party in order to cast a ballot in the first round of voting.

In spite of these barriers, the independent share of the electorate continues to grow. Jim and I painted a picture of how this voting rights gap had to be closed.

After a while, the KPR conversation turned to the topic of independent candidates and the difficulties they face in running competitive campaigns. Jim had been the campaign manager for Greg Orman’s nearly victorious U.S. Senate bid in 2014 and had firsthand experience with the legal and other barriers independents face.

He’d also dealt with the omnipresent media bias, the rampant attempts to paint Orman — a respected business leader and political independent — as a flake or a spoiler who stood for nothing.

I’d seen Orman that morning when Cathy Stewart, my colleague at Independent Voting, and I drove out to Olathe to visit with him. We spent some time talking about the newest versions of these attacks, now that Orman had announced his run for governor of Kansas as an independent.

Some Kansas Democrats were already insisting that any alternative to Trump and his Kansas protégé Kris Kobach (the possible Republican nominee) had to be a Democrat. With his eye for hypocrisy, Orman pointed to the record of the 111th Congress (January 2009-January 2011).

In his distinctly flat Kansas twang, Orman animatedly explained that the 111th — when Democrats controlled both houses and the White House — failed to pass comprehensive immigration reform or the Dream Act.

Why then, we felt, should anyone automatically defer to Democrats when there is an independent option? Anything that might stand in the way of a “blue wave” is frightening to the powers that be.

A big conversation in the independent movement these days is how to create the infrastructure necessary to capture an independent wave, and to channel it into a more powerful force.

In the KPR studios, Kaye McIntyre questioned us about this. Jim was ardent about the importance of creating the infrastructure — donors, databases, media experts, vendors — to aid independent candidates in winning. He’s currently the Executive Director of the National Association of Nonpartisan Reformers which aims to generate these tools.

I concurred with Jim’s prescription but added my own twist.

I told the story of Ross Perot’s appearance on the “Larry King Show” on CNN on February 20, 1992. The wiry billionaire Texan told King: “We’re the owners of this country, we don’t act like the owners, we act like white rabbits that get programmed with messages coming out of Washington.”

He dangled the idea of an independent presidential bid and said the American people would have to carry the ball to make it real. Millions of people called in the first 24 hours.

This is a story about building independent infrastructure, I explained. It isn’t an activity that belongs solely to professionals and entrepreneurs, however independent they might be.

It’s also a building process carved out by masses of people who — when they move in a particular direction — can create a vast infrastructure to support independent candidates, or voting reform, or any kind of disruption or reconstruction of the political system.

Look at what happened in 2016 with Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. Think of what could happen when independents rise outside of the parties.

When the KPR interview was over, we left the building, heading out to dinner in downtown Lawrence. The sky was darkening behind the hills and the wind was whipping. We’d heard there was a tornado watch underway, and we hurried to Jim’s rental car.

I checked the sky as we drove toward Massachusetts Street, just barely ahead of the downpour rolling in from the east.

This time there were no twisters, as it turned out. But I found myself thinking, there could be a tornado coming. It could be the independent movement. And, when it comes, it will hit the ground like a storm.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Tornado Watch in Kansas

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us