Skip to content
Subscribe

Steve Poizner's tough stance on illegal immigration has him rising in the polls against Meg Whitman

Published:

Steve Poizner was once considered too far behind in the polls for the Republican gubernatorial nomination; however, the tide now seems to be changing.  With recent events on the immigration reform front, Poizner seems to be using these issues as political capital in his surging bid.



According to Michael A. Moodian, assistant professor of social science at Brandman University in Irvine, immigration enforcer Poizner may now have a legitimate chance against the attack ad machine of Meg Whitman.  Poizner, he says, is reaffirming the campaign stance on the more heated issue of illegal immigration in an attempt to pin Whitman into the corner.



Both Poizner and Whitman differ on the Arizona immigration law, with Poizner strongly supporting it while Whitman has gone on record opposing it.  On the immigration issue, Moodian cites a peculiar coincidence between the initial popularity of Whitman in places like Orange County, and also her decline when she voiced her dissent.



Poizner is actually in line with the majority of Orange County residents favoring the crackdown and believing that illegal immigrants are a cost to the state (sixty six percent), Moodian said in his piece.  This is significant, Moodian said, because the OC is a conservative central of sorts in California, considered important in light of eyeing one’s chances for the Republican nomination.



Citing a poll taken of Republican residents in Orange County, Moodian says that the rise of Poizner is connected to an issue of “messaging.”  “What has happened since April, when Whitman was enjoying success in Orange County and elsewhere, while Poizner was reeling?,” he asked in his op-ed.


“It has been an issue of messaging. Our poll shows that after jobs and the economy (an issue that both candidates have addressed heavily), immigration is the second most important problem on the minds of people in Orange County,” he says.
Whitman’s opposition to the Arizona law is essentially a slap in the face of Republicans who once garnered strong support for her, and could hurt her in the future.


Poizner, as Moodian shows, is not only framing his message to match his base in the state, but also the general mood of the country as a whole.  Given this aspect of the situation, Poizner seems to matching up against Whitman very well and (as the author says) has decent shot at taking the nomination.


As to whether he’d survive round two (i.e. the general election) is highly questionable. Based on the sampling of Democrats in a recent poll, approximately 60 percent of Orange County residents oppose the crackdown mindset of Poizner.


Among independents, Poizner’s crackdown mentality is split right down the middle in terms of support.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Steve Poizner's tough stance on illegal immigration has him rising in the polls against Meg Whitman

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us