Skip to content
Subscribe

Poll: Almost Everyone Favors Nonpartisan Election Reform

Published:

Open Primaries, a national political reform organization, released the results of a new poll Monday that show overwhelming support for nonpartisan elections in Mississippi from a seemingly surprising group of voters. According to the poll, 85 percent of party primary voters on both sides of the political aisle favor nonpartisan primaries.

The statements and questions respondents were asked to weigh in on did not specifically name one type of nonpartisan election system. However, all voters seem to agree with the fundamental arguments behind nonpartisan election reform.

Would closed primaries be a step backward for Mississippi? Should the state have a fairer election system for those who choose not to identify with either major party? For all voters? Would a nonpartisan election system force politicians to represent people, not parties? Should voters have as much or more power in elections as political parties?

In the survey of 250 voters -- 125 voters who participated in the 2014 Cochran/McDaniel Republican Primary (which sparked controversy over how primaries are conducted), and 125 voters who participated in at least one of the last three Democratic primary elections -- an overwhelming majority answered yes to all of these questions.

  • 72 percent of voters polled think Mississippi needs a fairer election system.
  • 94 percent of Mississippians surveyed believe voters need to have as much or more power as political parties.
  • 85 percent of voters polled think a nonpartisan system will force politicians to represent the people and not the parties.
  • 86 percent believe closed primaries would be a step backwards for the state.

While 250 voters is not much of a sample size, the responses speak volumes about how voters view elections. The idea of fairer elections that give everyone an equal voice and put voters above private organizations -- like political parties -- is something most people can agree with. It is also a cornerstone to the fundamental argument in favor of nonpartisan primaries.

Mississippi's secretary of state convened a 50-member study group to consider possible alternatives to the current election system in the state. The group's report, released in January, showed that more members supported a nonpartisan, top-two primary system than any other proposed reform or preserving the status quo.

“A Top Two system would bring significant benefits to Mississippi voters as we have seen in other states such as California," said John Opdycke, president of Open Primaries, in a press release.

"The California Legislature is still dominated by Democrats, just as it was under the old partisan system. Today, however, Democratic legislators are much less vulnerable to being told what to do by their party leaders. They don’t just ask party leadership how to vote. They talk to their constituents and vote based on a variety of inputs. So while Democrats may constitute a super majority in the California Legislature, the Democratic Party does not control it. That is a huge and consequential distinction for all Californians and would benefit Mississippi voters as well.”

Based on the questions asked by Open Primaries, it would a leap to say that these voters would specifically get behind a top-two primary system. However, it is clear that most voters fundamentally agree with the purpose of nonpartisan election reform.

Photo Credit: Ken Wolter / shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Poll: Almost Everyone Favors Nonpartisan Election Reform

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us