Skip to content
Subscribe

Obama administration and labor union allies proclaim victory in Arizona immigration ruling

Published:

With a federal judge striking key provisions of Arizona’s immigration law, the Obama administration proclaimed victory along with labor union allies.  Labor unions have been some of the staunchest opponents of the Arizona law and strongest advocates of a fast track legalization process.

Among these unions would be the UFCW and SEIU.  And their strong opposition to the Arizona law would seem to make sense from a political perspective.  Slower influxes of immigrants to the states would stunt membership growth, and slower membership growth equals a thinner cash flow for political causes, which typically leans democratic.

The SEIU also recently released a video comparing television pundits and supporters of the Arizona immigration law to dictatorial-like oppressors.

For an administration whose stated goal was to end partisan politics, its credibility may have been tarnished as it has seemingly aligned itself with groups demonizing the majority of Americans who support the law.  But, this also makes political sense in light of the fact that President Obama easily won the labor vote in 2008.

Arizona governor Jan Brewer vowed that the fight isn’t over concerning this recent defeat in court.  "Illegal immigration is an ongoing crisis the state of Arizona did not create and the federal government has refused to fix," Brewer said. "SB 1070 protects all of us, every Arizona citizen and everyone here in our state lawfully."

Arizona will seek an appeal on the ruling from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The court, based in San Francisco, is considered among the most liberal-leaning in the nation.  One way or another, the case was going to be headed in that direction as both parties involved in the lawsuit would have appealed the case had their respective side lost.  It could be a year or more before the case possibly reaches the Supreme Court.

While comprehensive immigration reform might be necessary to some extent, the way the Obama administration is handling the matter doesn’t appear to be consistent with the general welfare clause in the U.S. Constitution, a clause often cited in its justification for national healthcare reform.

It would appear that the current administration is playing the special interest political game, a business as usual approach that many hoped would change.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Obama administration and labor union allies proclaim victory in Arizona immigration ruling

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us