Skip to content
Subscribe

Neither Party Represents Majority of Independents on Immigration

Published:

Credit: fairimmigration.org

Credit: fairimmigration.org

A Gallup poll released Monday found neither Democrats' nor Republicans' views on immigration closely align with that of self-described independents. Almost a third of independents fell between Democrats (37%) and Republicans (35%). Yet, over one-fourth (28%) did not identify with either major party on the immigration issue. Credit: Gallup

Credit: Gallup

Conversely, a significant majority of Democrats and Republicans, 89 and 85 percent respectively, agree with their party's immigration policy.

Overall, the Gallup poll found that, "Americans are more likely to say their views on immigration and immigration reform align with the Democratic Party's than with the Republican Party's policies, although fewer than half relate to either party on the issue."

Although specific policy disagreements remain particularly polarizing, provisions that would establish a path to citizenship have broad support.

When examined outside of the partisan context, the large majority of Americans do support a path to citizenship in some form. From Gallup, "[Most] conservatives (83%) support a plan that ultimately allows illegal immigrants to become citizens; moderate (92%) and liberal (91%) support is only slightly higher."

Right now, all eyes lay on the House of Representatives as Democrats hope to sure up enough Republican votes by beefing up border security to overcome the Hastert Rule. A rule which came into existence less than 20 years ago and technically doesn't really exist, has significantly slowed progress on an immigration package.

Over the last decade, Americans' priorities on immigration have flipped. Before 2012, about 55 percent of voters preferred to halt the influx of illegal immigrants. Whereas post-2012 55 percent now favor "developing a plan to deal with immigrants who are currently in the U.S. illegally."

While the plurality of unaffiliated voters preferring one side over the other remains within the margin of error, over a quarter of independents do not feel represented by either party in Washington. Ultimately, it remains to be seen whether or not Congress will be able to pass substantive reform, even with sizable support for one of the most contentious issues of the bill.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Neither Party Represents Majority of Independents on Immigration

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us