Skip to content
Subscribe

Looming Arizona immigration law sets the stage for impassioned debate

Published:

While Arizona’s immigration law is set to take effect this Thursday, there is much to consider both now and after the law is implemented.  It seems as if the law is already fulfilling its intentions.

The LA Times is reporting that many illegals are fleeing the state ahead of July 29, the date the law takes effect.  Their article, however, demonstrates their bias in such a way that frames the Arizona government as villains of Arizona’s small businesses whose customers are illegal immigrants.  Instead of merely reporting that illegal immigrants are fleeing the state, the Times quotes the shop owner as saying that his business is broken because many of his illegal immigrant customers will soon be gone due to the new law.

Contrary to what publications like the Times writes, it is not the Arizona government’s fault that small business will suffer as a result of the new law.  Neither is it the shop owner’s fault that he will lose a majority of his customers.

I posit that it stems from federal neglect in finding a viable solution to illegal immigrants flooding the states over the past several years. And yes, President Reagan played a big role too when he granted amnesty in 1986.

Currently, the implementation of the Arizona law comes even as immigration in the state is apparently already dropping.  This stat doesn’t make the law useless, but rather sets the stage for Arizona to deal with the more serious threats like Mexican drug cartels.  While what are termed “hard-working” immigrants flee, drug cartels and gang lords will inevitably become more of a concentration that Arizona law enforcement will focus on extinguishing, making the best efforts in enhancing the safety of residents.

With illegal immigrants fleeing Arizona, that will leave surrounding states like California to absorb them.

Unfortunately, there is no doubt that the debate has been dominated by partisan bickering instead of common sense solutions.  In a sense, the partisan bickering is understandable. Both parties have to look like they’re doing something instead of merely sitting on their hands with the hot issue.

Hispanics account for one of the largest voting blocs in the nation. Losing that one particular bloc would be detrimental to any party in the two party system, which the Republican Party knows very well.  When it comes to immigration reform, it will boil down to which party has the more effective message this November and beyond.

When this factor is combined with the ant-incumbent sentiment going into November, the results of both California’s statewide election and the nation’s election will make for an intriguing political narrative.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Looming Arizona immigration law sets the stage for impassioned debate

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us