Skip to content
Subscribe

Left-leaning media debate potential political impact of the Tea Party

Published:

While some pundits and politicians on the left have tried minimizing the Tea Party as an irrelevant sect in American politics, others on the left are saying otherwise.  Media Matters, Daily Kos, and MSNBC have attacked the Tea Party as an unintelligent fringe group.

However, as those attacks continue, it’s definitely a surprise to see liberal publications like The New York Times acknowledge that the Tea Party could be the death knell of the current Washington establishment.  The Times reports that Tea Party candidates are running strong in Republican-leaning Congressional districts, as well as in other non-Republican districts.  Their impact might be so strong that they’ll be enough of a force to push forward an agenda in both the House and the Senate in the new term.

What's even more of a surprise is that the acknowledgement comes from Times reporter Kate Zernicke. Zernicke came under fire earlier this year for her coverage of a speech by a former conservative activist at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference.  So, while the Times gets pounded by conservatives for biased coverage, it doesn’t completely take away their credibility in reporting the facts in certain cases.

The Washington Post, another left-leaning publication, recently published a piece discussing a fresh analysis of Tea Party signs at rallies.  The analysis, conducted by UCLA student Emily Ekins, found that approximately a quarter of rally signs directed anger at the President and that racial content was not as widespread as depicted by other media outlets.  Miss Ekins’s research found that the Tea Party’s message centered on limited government, liberty, lower taxes, fiscal responsibility, and free market capitalism.

The more accurate message of the movement itself is still getting out to voters, thanks to news outlets who adhere to the grand tradition of journalism.  Negative Tea Party coverage, as exemplified by CNN in the beginning of the movement, doesn’t seem to have distanced voters from embracing it as a genuine grassroots effort. In fact, the Tea Party has polled relatively well with mainstream voters.

While certain candidates within the Tea Party movement have been prone to gaffes, the Tea Party itself hasn’t really suffered any measurable damage from these setbacks.  Perhaps the reason lies in the fact that  voters are tired of politicians who think they’re entitled to political power.  The true test comes in 18 days, when we find out whether a true people-driven revolution has arrived.  

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Left-leaning media debate potential political impact of the Tea Party

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us