Skip to content
Subscribe

Can the GOP Create Consensus from Gridlock?

Published:

When the House switched to Republican control in the 2010 midterms, it was treated as a referendum on President Barack Obama’s health care law. Two years later, the GOP set its sights on the White House. However, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney was not able to beat Obama. Now, the Senate is the prize in next week’s elections.

The GOP is now promising consensus the same way Obama, as a presidential candidate, promised unity. The current Senate minority leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would have the most to gain from Republicans taking over the majority and that responsibility falls on him.

Critics would say that this was part of his master plan to obstruct Obama’s executive orders and legislative efforts, but the senior senator from Kentucky understands the power behind a disgruntled electorate and the importance of consensus.

Especially, if that consensus crosses partisan lines:

“An executive order can’t . The fiat of a nine-person court can’t do it. A raucous and precarious partisan majority in the House can’t do it. The only institution that can make stable and enduring laws is the one we have in which all 50 states are represented equally, and where every single senator has a say in the laws that we pass.”

The Senate majority leader can’t simply pass all the bills he wants no matter what party he belongs to. It would benefit the Republicans to be more open with their opponents once they are in charge so as not to re-create the obstructionist methods that became a trait of both parties.There are some areas where McConnell should not cave in with the more conservative wing of the House. Take health care reform for example.

The Democratic majority in the Senate has been the primary bulwark preventing any House-approved repeal-Obamacare legislation. Now, even if the Senate does turn red, the ACA still has other safeguards protecting it.

There is no way Obama will sign a law repealing his prized legislative victory. It would be futile for McConnell to focus on that while the public is clamoring for Congress to fix so many other areas like the economy and jobs, foreign policy, and energy policy.

There are plenty of stories in the news about what the Republicans will do when they pick up 6 seats. Their goal should not be to continue running Congress the way their colleagues ran the House since 2010. There will be no need for that.

Sen. McConnell will be judged on his words if he is serious about creating a non-raucous and more certain Senate. If working with Democrats to pass bills is the way to go, so be it. The trick will be to select the bills that can survive a filibuster, assuming McConnell is serious about changing that rule as well.

No photo credit attributed.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

Can the GOP Create Consensus from Gridlock?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us