Skip to content
Subscribe

California 2026: The Candidates, Choices, and Elections That Show How Much Power Independent Voters Really Have

The Golden State's nonpartisan primary system allows all voters to participate in this November's legislative races, offering a unique test of how DSA-backed candidates compete when elections aren't decided in closed Democratic primaries.

California 2026: The Candidates, Choices, and Elections That Show How Much Power Independent Voters Really Have
Image Credit: Carlos A. Moreno/ZUMA Press Wire/ Alamy Live News on Alamy. Image license obtained and used exclusively by IVN Editor Shawn Griffiths for editorial purposes only.
Published:

Since the passage of California’s Nonpartisan Primary, IVN has provided simple, objective information on candidates who make it to the November ballot each election year.

Every election cycle presents a different challenge. But the goal remains the same: publish, in one place, what each candidate shares about themselves, their experience, and what they want to do in office.

Sometimes California’s election system also provides a unique window into national politics.

The battle between the Democratic Socialists of America and so-called Mainstream Democrats has mostly played out in closed partisan primaries throughout the country.

But in California, five competitive contests for seats in the state Legislature this November feature a DSA-backed or recommended Democrat against a more mainstream Democrat.

That matters because California does not require voters to join a political party to participate in these elections. Under the state’s Top Two system, every voter can vote for any candidate in the primary, and the two candidates receiving the most votes advance to November regardless of party preference.

As a result, California may provide a particularly useful test of how DSA candidates and their platforms perform when the electorate extends beyond Democratic primary voters and the choice is not determined inside a partisan primary.

These are overwhelmingly Democratic districts in which almost any Republican would face long odds. In most of the nation, that means the election that effectively determines who holds the seat happens in a Democratic primary in which independent and Republican voters cannot participate.

Not here.

Thousands of California voters in these districts are not Democrats, but they will have exactly the same choices in November as Democratic voters.

What will they do with them?

Will Republicans skip these two-Democrat contests? Will independents gravitate toward anti-establishment candidates backed by DSA? Will they instead consolidate behind the more mainstream candidates? Or will voters behave in ways neither political camp expects?

A new example in this week's Open Primaries newsletter about West Virginia suggests that last question may deserve more attention.

This year, West Virginia Republicans closed their primary to unaffiliated voters for the first time since the 1980s. More than 21,000 voters chose a no-party ballot instead, a 74% increase from the 2022 midterm primary.

Republican ballots cast fell 22% from 2022 even as Republican registration increased. At the registration deadline, roughly 302,000 West Virginians, or 25.2% of the electorate, were registered with no party.

Those voters could still participate in statewide nonpartisan judicial contests. In those races, two state Supreme Court justices appointed by Republican Gov. Patrick Morrisey lost their elections.

Those results alone can't tell us precisely why individual voters made those choices. But the numbers raise an interesting question for political parties everywhere: What happens when voters are told they cannot participate in the contest a party considers most important?

California offers the opposite experiment.

Instead of asking independents and voters from the other party to sit out, the state puts the same candidates in front of everyone and lets the entire electorate decide.

Five Democrat-versus-Democrat legislative races this November will give us an unusually clear look at what those voters do with that power.

There are lessons here for everyone. We plan to do our best to provide objective coverage and to encourage everyone to make their own choice.

Voter Guides and Races To Watch (Check Back for More Updates)

Statewide

Guide to California’s Proposals for Independent-Minded Voters

US Congress

Democrats Gerrymandered David Valadao’s District. Did It Backfire?

Assembly and Senate

East LA: Independent Voters May Decide Whether or Not Socialists Win Senate Seat

Forget Brooklyn. Socialism's Next Test Runs Through West LA, and Independents Are the Judges

DSA on One Side, Labor and Cops on the Other: South Bay Independents Get the Deciding Vote

Orange County, Birthplace of the Reagan Revolution, May Be About to Elect a Socialist

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California 2026: The Candidates, Choices, and Elections That Show How Much Power Independent Voters Really Have

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us