Skip to content
Subscribe

50 Shades of Jeb: The (Non-)Candidate Has A New Answer on Iraq Every Day

Published:

Jeb Bush is expected to announce he is running for president in 2016 -- at some point. Right now, he is reportedly skirting campaign finance laws in order to build a super PAC that is "unprecedented in size and scope," according to Politico.

Bush is not the only candidate in the race who is challenging whatever campaign finance laws the U.S. has left after a number of Supreme Court rulings over the past few years. The Washington Post reported Tuesday that at least one super PAC is making plans to coordinate directly with Hillary Clinton's campaign.

Yes, if the 2016 presidential campaign has taught us anything so far, it is that the idea of campaign finance laws is as laughable in American politics as any suggestion that we have fair elections or a representative government.

But Jeb Bush has also made headlines for another reason this week: he can't seem to give a straight answer on Iraq.

In a segment on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, Stewart takes a look at the gradually and rapidly evolving position the (non-)presidential candidate has on whether or not going into Iraq was a mistake -- a drama that started on Fox News' The Kelly File and included one 19-year-old college student in Nevada who told him his brother created ISIS.

Let's start with the question from Megyn Kelly: "On the subject of Iraq -- obviously very controversial -- knowing what we know now, would you have authorized the invasion?"

Jeb Bush: "I would have, and so would have Hillary Clinton ... and so would have almost everybody who was confronted with the intelligence they got."

Bush later said he misheard the question, which judging by his response seems to be the case because Kelly specifically said "knowing what we know now."

On May 12, Sean Hannity re-phrased the question and asked for clarification. In his response, Bush said "mistakes were made as they always are in life."

Not quite there yet, Jeb. Let's try it again.

On May 13, Bush said he admired the men and women (and for some reason felt the need to follow that with "mostly men") who made the ultimate sacrifice and said engaging in such hypotheticals does our troops a disservice.

Finally, on May 14, Bush said that if he had to answer a hypothetical like the one asked of him time and time again, he would not have sent troops into Iraq.

Granted, the question he was asked on Fox News put him in a precarious position politically. On one hand, there is what a majority of Americans believe, and that is in hindsight going to Iraq was a bad call. On the other hand, if Bush said from the very beginning that he would not have invaded Iraq, that would have thrown his big bro under the bus.

However, tip-toeing around the question just dragged the whole thing out longer than necessary and prevented the mainstream media from talking about other things to keep Americans distracted. The one thing Jeb is going to have to come to terms with in this election if he wants the GOP nomination and if he wants to win is that his last name is Bush, and that means answering some difficult questions.

But remember, we can't call him a candidate yet. At least, not officially, because he has not officially entered the race. Ask him about his campaign and he will remind you that he is not a candidate yet. He has to say that, because acknowledging he is running for president means shaky campaign finance laws now apply, which apparently candidates can get around anyway with ease.

Jeb Bush is one of the few candidates left who everyone knows is going to enter, is acting like a candidate, but refuses to be called a candidate.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

50 Shades of Jeb: The (Non-)Candidate Has A New Answer on Iraq Every Day

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us