Skip to content
Subscribe

$16 Billion Deficit Underscores Need For Real Reforms

Published:

Governor Jerry Brown announced this week that the deficit has ballooned to a monstrous $16 billion dollars, an amount equal to 17 percent of the state’s entire general fund.

So, California’s self-perpetuating job killing machine continues:

The state continues to have a stagnant economy due to the financial crisis of 2008 and hideous economic climate created by ridiculous amounts of government red tape. Accordingly, businesses flee the state or can’t add new jobs. Revenues drop. However, California’s budgets are predicated on budget gimmicks like wildly optimistic “revenue projections” that never materialize because the economy is so bad. Shockingly, when these revenue projections turn out to be woefully inaccurate – we are short $2 billion in tax revenues – cuts to services become inevitable.

Governor Brown’s real concern? That if his $8.5 billion dollar tax hike doesn’t pass the cuts will be worse.

This delusional bit of logic underscores Sacramento’s credibility deficit as well revenue deficit. California’s revenue forecasts are a pure fiction given the state’s economic climate. So how can voters trust that the massive tax hike on the “rich” will be “temporary” and that it will satisfy Sacramento’s insatiable thirst for a revenue stream of other people’s money to spend, spend, spend? They can’t.

When the state relies on personal income tax on the highest 1% of earners, it makes the budgetary process a wild rollercoaster ride with little stability or predictability. The latest tax hike will make California even more dependent on this fickle revenue stream, not to mention that it is another nail in the coffin of economic recovery.

While I am adamantly opposed to another enormous tax hike, I continue to advocate that the voters be offered a sane range of choices come November. In addition to Governor Brown’s tax hike, 2 crucial reforms should be allowed on the ballot for voters to consider.

The two biggest threats to a real California economic recovery are the looming $500 billion pension costs faced by the state, counties and municipalities and the continuous out-of-control spending by politicians in Sacramento. Governor Brown and Republican’s pension reform measure should be placed on the ballot as well as a “hard” spending cap – literally spending cannot outpace revenue. It remains to be seen if a single Democrat will support the pension reform proposal or give it a proper hearing in Sacramento. The spending cap proposal also faces a very hostile Legislature that doesn’t want any impediment to unrestrained spending.

Let the voters decide. They can make an informed choice only if they have a complete range of choices before them.  These decisions are crucial to California’s future economy.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

$16 Billion Deficit Underscores Need For Real Reforms

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us