Skip to content
Subscribe

Republican Consultants and Pollsters Have Tarnished the Brand

Published:

Democrat and Republican consultants and media mouths have settled on a few generalizations to define the independent voter: “low information,” “moderate,” or “undecided.” But the generalized terms forget the more personal reality of an independent voter. An independent is, by definition, not bound by the traditional political indicators that have painted our political maps red and blue.

These same political consultants have stopped running campaigns of persuasion, in favor of a divide and conquer strategy: run negative ads and push out the people who don’t see the difference in one evil over another. Once the non-partisans have been disenfranchised, the side that pushes out more of its base on Election Day wins. And third parties and independent candidates are largely irrelevant in an electoral system designed and crafted by a team of two.

Now, Republican consultants and pollsters have been called to the thrown for being so wrong this election. But they’ve been wrong for a lot longer than that. The Karl Rove’s of the world are brilliant short-term strategists; they understand the emotion and human reaction to carefully crafted rhetoric; they see voters as statistics; they measure success by the number of seats they win. The Republican Party, its consultants, and its pollsters, seek ideological uniformity within a party that has traditionally prided itself on its big-tent.

As a result, the Republicans end up with a bunch of “I agree with you” candidates who refuse to take a stand in opposition the ideological purists in the tent. As a consequence, women, gays, minorities, and the young voters who have grown up in a more interconnected and socially accepting world have walked out of the tent. A large number of these voters voted for Obama, or nobody at all. But in any case, they are not Democrats. They are independent voters.

These are the independents that the politicians and moving mouths say are “really Republicans,” in part because of their voting history and in part because of their traditional political tendencies. In the short-term, the “ignore them and they’ll end up with us anyway” strategy has worked for the Republicans. But not anymore.

There is a civil war in the Republican Party more complex than polling data alone can show. You can’t determine just how many voters finally had enough when John Huntsman had any presidential hopes erased by conceding that he believed in scientific evidence. You can’t measure the number of independent-minded Republicans that supported Ron Paul, in all his earnest honesty, only to see him marginalized at every turn like an unwanted stepchild by the party-brokers. You can’t deny that his “tea party” son and Senator Rand Paul has little in common with the “tea party” Congresswoman Michelle Bachman. There is no saying how many votes Romney lost, not because Obama met with Governor Christy after the storm devastated his State, but because the Republicans failed to give the president and their own credit when it was the right thing to do.

And you can’t put a number on the number of voters who have heard one too many attacks on the other party, made one too many campaign promises that they don’t really mean, and too few new ideas from a party that used to pride itself on its intellectualism.

These are not Democratic voters. And they aren’t Republican voters anymore. They are independent-minded voters. They don’t believe the Republican is always right and the Democrat is always wrong. Often, they don’t think either one is right. And even more often, they just want authenticity; someone who is honest in their beliefs, humble enough to admit when they are wrong, and mature enough to run a campaign of persuasion. In short, they are looking for the characteristics of true leaders

The Republican Party brand is tarnished. It’s like a company that has produced one too many widgets that just don’t work like advertised. The only difference is, there are plenty of good Republicans within the Republican Party. And the Republican Party will win back independents, repair its brand, and be stronger for it, when the pollsters and consultants that got us where we are today get out of the way and let them lead.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Republican Consultants and Pollsters Have Tarnished the Brand

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us