Skip to content
Subscribe

Video: The Two-Party System is Not Working for The People

Published:

Is a third political party straining to break out in America? That is the question posed by the Wall Street Journal's Washington bureau chief, Gerald Seib, in a June 1 column.His answer was a clear "yes." But the real question is why?According to Ambassador James K. Glassman, it's because "an independent, or third-party, candidate has not the slightest chance of getting to the White House or even seriously influencing the policies espoused by the two major party candidates."In a column penned for RealClearPolitics, Glassman points the finger at Frank Fahrenkopf and Mike McCurry, co-chairs of the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), saying these men and the members of their board (listed here) refuse to give independent candidates a real chance to break through.This is despite the fact that Americans are crying out for new policies and approaches to end the gridlock and restore health to the American government. Need convincing? Just check out this video where people are asked, "how well do you think our two party system is working for us?":https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOHRyr8vkPMYou could also check out any number of recent polls along those same lines. Take, for example, this one out of George Washington University in DC, which finds that Americans' pessimism about the current state of the country extends to the field of candidates for the 2016 presidential race.The CPD is supposed to be "nonpartisan." Its members have the power to remedy this situation by changing one rule to open up the debates to include a third, independent candidate - and can do so in time to impact the 2016 presidential election.As the editors of USA Today point out, such a move would, "make it harder for the major-party candidates to stick to talking points and platitudes."Instead, members stand by archaic hurdles that can only be cleared by a Democrat and a Republican. And we all know if you can't get into the debates, you can't get elected president.I'll close with another quote from Glassman's piece that is spot on:"America does indeed want independent and third-party candidates to run for president. It is a corrupt and closed system that denies them the choice. That system can be changed tomorrow if patriotically inclined members of the CPD prevail over the partisans."Editor's note: This update to Presidential Debate News originally published on the organization's website on June 10, 2015, and has been edited for publication on IVN.

Photo Credit: gallofilm / shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Video: The Two-Party System is Not Working for The People

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us