Asm. Catharine Baker Looks Outside Party Politics for Education Reform

Asm. Catharine Baker Looks Outside Party Politics for Education Reform
Published: 03 Mar, 2015
2 min read

SACRAMENTO, CALIF. -- Most Americans think of districts as being either red or blue; if the majority of registered voters in a district are Democrats, then it is assumed that the representative of that district will be a Democrat as well. However, in California, there is more to politics than this false dichotomy, and the 16th Assembly District is a prime example.

Voter Registration in AD-16

Catharine Baker (R-Pleasanton), serving her first term in the California Legislature, was elected in November to represent California’s 16th district. Her victory in the midterm election was unexpected and extraordinary considering her district’s location in Northern California, an area that is known for voting for more liberal candidates.

District 16 is located in the East Bay and primarily consists of suburbs like Lamorinda and the Tri-Valley. Republican Party registration in the district trails Democrats by approximately 7 percentage points (39% and 32%, respectively), but unaffiliated voters make up over 22 percent of the registered voting population. A possible cause of Baker’s victory is California’s more competitive electoral system, which forces voters to focus on issues rather than simply voting with their affiliated party.

Governor Jerry Brown, a Democrat, carried Assembly District 16 with 62 percent of the vote in the 2014 general election. Baker managed to defeat Democrat Tim Sbranti 52 percent to 48 percent.

Before taking office, Baker was an attorney who worked with small businesses and nonprofits, served on several local school committees, and volunteered for education programs. Her emphasis on education in her professional life and in her political goals appealed to voters.

In an interview for IVN, she explained how aligning with her district makes all the difference.

“I will always be mindful that my purpose  is to represent my district and do what constituents expect, not to represent my party,” she said.

Baker's issue-based priorities allign with those of her contituents. Her values are complimented by her personal and professional experience to spotlight issues that need to be fixed and improvements that can be made in her district.

During her interview, Baker elaborated on her goals in education:

IVP Donate

“We need to modernize  with support for innovation, for STEM, and the professional development  teachers and principals need and deserve.” - Asm. Catharine Baker, Assembly District 16

Baker said the influence of special interests and partisanship can be difficult to overcome when seeking real change in education. However, she added that her focus will remain on doing what is best for her district.

“I will address  by focusing on advocacy and outreach in my district, and by focusing my legislation on the needs of my constituents in Sacramento,” Baker remarked.

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read