The Curious Case of Bob Schieffer: Does the Debate Commission Tolerate Dissent?

The Curious Case of Bob Schieffer: Does the Debate Commission Tolerate Dissent?
Published: 22 Sep, 2016
2 min read

According to the internet’s wayback machine, retired CBS broadcaster Bob Schieffer was a member of the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) between September 2015 and December 2015.

This is an oddly short period of service. Most other CPD members seem to serve for years. Co-Chair Frank J. Fahrenkopf, Jr., for instance, has been around since the commission's beginning, having co-founded the organization in 1987. While the other members' tenure doesn't go back that far, many have been around since at least 2014.

But three months? Did something happen?

The precise process for Schieffer's departure from the CPD is private, but one curious fact is known: When Schieffer appeared on Face the Nation in October 2015, the show he previously hosted, he criticized the Clinton campaign, saying, “I find her campaign astonishingly inept.”

https://twitter.com/BrentBozell/status/652828260301193216

An hours-long Google, Bing, Yahoo, and DuckDuckGo search found no such negative comments toward Clinton or her campaign from any current or previous member of the CPD. Coincidence? Maybe. The timing of the comment compared to when he ceased to be a member of the CPD is certainly curious, though.

The CPD's membership is composed of former leaders and elected officials of the two major parties. Fahrenkopf is a former chairman of the Republican National Committee. Co-Chair Michael D. McCurry served as communications director for the Democratic National Committee and President Bill Clinton's press secretary.

Records on OpenSecrets.org show that McCurry has given thousands to Hillary Clinton over the years, including a donation on the day she announced her 2016 campaign in April 2015. In fact, many of its members have given to Clinton.

Again, this could all be coincidence. There is no concrete proof available that Schieffer was removed or forced out in any way. But it should certainly raise some eyebrows.

IVP Donate

What do you think?

Photo Credit: U.S. Air Force photo / Master Sgt. Scott Wagers

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read