The Curious Case of Bob Schieffer: Does the Debate Commission Tolerate Dissent?

The Curious Case of Bob Schieffer: Does the Debate Commission Tolerate Dissent?
Published: 22 Sep, 2016
2 min read

According to the internet’s wayback machine, retired CBS broadcaster Bob Schieffer was a member of the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) between September 2015 and December 2015.

This is an oddly short period of service. Most other CPD members seem to serve for years. Co-Chair Frank J. Fahrenkopf, Jr., for instance, has been around since the commission's beginning, having co-founded the organization in 1987. While the other members' tenure doesn't go back that far, many have been around since at least 2014.

But three months? Did something happen?

The precise process for Schieffer's departure from the CPD is private, but one curious fact is known: When Schieffer appeared on Face the Nation in October 2015, the show he previously hosted, he criticized the Clinton campaign, saying, “I find her campaign astonishingly inept.”

https://twitter.com/BrentBozell/status/652828260301193216

An hours-long Google, Bing, Yahoo, and DuckDuckGo search found no such negative comments toward Clinton or her campaign from any current or previous member of the CPD. Coincidence? Maybe. The timing of the comment compared to when he ceased to be a member of the CPD is certainly curious, though.

The CPD's membership is composed of former leaders and elected officials of the two major parties. Fahrenkopf is a former chairman of the Republican National Committee. Co-Chair Michael D. McCurry served as communications director for the Democratic National Committee and President Bill Clinton's press secretary.

Records on OpenSecrets.org show that McCurry has given thousands to Hillary Clinton over the years, including a donation on the day she announced her 2016 campaign in April 2015. In fact, many of its members have given to Clinton.

Again, this could all be coincidence. There is no concrete proof available that Schieffer was removed or forced out in any way. But it should certainly raise some eyebrows.

IVP Donate

What do you think?

Photo Credit: U.S. Air Force photo / Master Sgt. Scott Wagers

You Might Also Like

Why Neither Side Wants the Truth About Voter ID
Why Neither Side Wants the Truth About Voter ID
Voter ID is treated like a five-alarm fire in American politics. That reaction says more about our dysfunctional political system than it does about voter ID itself. ...
06 Feb, 2026
-
3 min read
Oklahoma Independents Drive Massive Push to Open Primaries With State Question 836
Oklahoma Independents Drive Massive Push to Open Primaries With State Question 836
While much of the U.S. was slammed with severe winter weather over the weekend, volunteers for Oklahoma State Question 836 – which would end the use of taxpayer-funded closed primaries – made a final push to get their campaign to over 200,000 petition signatures....
27 Jan, 2026
-
3 min read
NEW POLL: California Governor’s Race Sees “None of the Above” Beat the Entire Democratic Field
NEW POLL: California Governor’s Race Sees “None of the Above” Beat the Entire Democratic Field
A new statewide poll conducted by the Independent Voter Project finds California’s independent voters overwhelmingly support the state’s nonpartisan primary system and express broad dissatisfaction with the direction of state politics....
12 Jan, 2026
-
4 min read