Skip to content
Subscribe

Poll: Double digit support for hypothetical Independent Presidential candidates

Published:

Late last week, Public Policy Polling released the results of a survey gauging support for seven potential Independent candidates for President in 2012.  Four out of the seven polled in the double digits, despite the fact that none has definitively stated an intention to seek the nation's highest office as an Independent.

The automated survey of 700 registered voters was conducted between August 18th and August 21st.  The poll asked respondents how they would vote in seven different hypothetical scenarios pitting President Obama and Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney against an Independent candidate in a three-way contest.  The survey measured support for New York City's Independent Mayor Michael Bloomberg, former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman, perennial presidential candidate Ralph Nader, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, Texas Congressman Ron Paul, Independent Senator Bernie Sanders and businessman Donald Trump.  It is noteworthy that the survey did not include Rhode Island's Lincoln  Chafee in its questionnaire. Chafee is the only sitting Independent  governor in the nation.

The poll suggests that an Independent candidate for president would draw support away from the president's Republican challenger.

"Despite their grumbling, Democrats remain pretty united behind Obama,  and six of the seven possible independent candidates would hurt Romney  more than the president," writes Dustin Ingalls in an analysis of the results at the PPP blog.

Previous surveys have shown Romney polling competitively with the President in a head-to-head matchup.  With an Independent in the mix, the President takes the lead by comfortable margins in all seven scenarios tested by PPP.

Four of the seven potential Independent candidates included in the survey polled in the double digits.  Sarah Palin demonstrated the highest level of support as an Independent, garnering 21% support among all registered voters.  18% of respondents stated they would prefer Donald Trump in a three-way contest.  15% said they would cast their ballots for Ron Paul were he to run as an Independent.  And 10% expressed support for Michael Bloomberg.  Both Huntsman and Nader polled 7% support, with Bernie Sanders trailing at the bottom of the pack with 5%.

Among Independent voters, the numbers were slightly different.  Independents were slightly more likely to support Obama, and more likely to express support for the Independent candidate than were all respondents in the general sample.  The hypothetical Independent candidacy of Ron Paul came out on the top of the pack among registered Independents, garnering 20% support.  Donald Trump received 17% among the unaffiliated in a three-way contest.  Sarah Palin proved to be much less popular among Independents than in the general sample, with 15% support.  13% of Independents said they would vote for New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.  Huntsman, Nader and Sanders received 9%, 8% and 7% support, respectively, among Independents in the matchups tested by the survey.

It is also significant that three of the potential Independent candidates tested in the survey earned at least 15% support in the poll.  The corporate Commission on Presidential Debates, which is controlled by the Democratic and Republican parties, requires that a third party or Independent candidate for the presidency must demonstrate at least 15% support across a number of polls in order to be included in any debates sponsored or produced by the Commission.

Furthermore, there is reason to suspect that the results of the PPP survey significantly underestimate the level of support for any of the Independent alternatives to Obama and Romney.  A recent report at Talking Points Memo identified Public Policy Polling as "the "It" Democratic pollster."  And, indeed, the organization's survey samples often skew strongly toward Democrats.  This was the case in the current poll.  Of the poll's 700 respondents, 41% were Democrats, 37% were Republicans and just 21% said they were Independents or "other."  In a Pew Research survey released the same day as the PPP poll, 39% of respondents stated that they were Independents, compared with 29% who said they were Democrats and 26% who said they were Republicans.

Given that Independents are much more likely to consider supporting an Independent or third party candidate for President, and given that they were severely underrepresented in the PPP poll, it is possible that the PPP survey significantly underestimated support for an Independent alternative to the candidates of the Democratic and Republican parties.

Hopefully, other polling organizations will follow PPP's lead and begin gauging support for Independent and third party candidates ahead of next year's elections.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Poll: Double digit support for hypothetical Independent Presidential candidates

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us