Skip to content
Subscribe

Poll: Most Californians Want an End to Sanctuary Cities

Published:

San Diego, CALIF.- A stunning new poll is out on the “sanctuary cities” debate, and it shows a huge divide between what the people of California want from their lawmakers, and what state lawmakers are actually doing in Sacramento.

The latest IGS-UC Berkeley poll shows 74 percent of Californians want an end to sanctuary cities. The poll notes 65 percent of Hispanics, 70 percent of independents, 73 percent of Democrats, and 82 percent of Republicans want an end to the designation.

Eighteen cities and counties in California, including the three largest counties -- Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Diego -- are all currently classified as “Sanctuary.” Governor Jerry Brown recently passed the Trust Act, which essentially makes California a "Sanctuary State."

At his State of the State Address Tuesday, Gov. Brown said, “As a state we can and have had a role to play. California has enacted several protective measures for the undocumented: the Trust Act, lawful driver’s licenses, basic employment rights and non-discriminatory access to higher education.”

The "Sanctuary" classification brings California about $135 million in grants. However, that money could be in serious jeopardy under President Trump, who has vowed to end funding for any city or county that continues the practice.

An attorney for the ACLU, Jonathan Blazer, believes funding cuts to sanctuary cities are unlikely to happen. Blazer notes that Congress has failed to take action even when both the Senate and the House were under Republican control.

Blazer said, “I don’t think that the localities are cowering in the face of this threat by and large, they’re ready for a fight.”

David Carrillo, executive director of the California Constitution Center at Berkeley Law, said this is not the time to take a wait and see approach with the federal government. Carrillo said, “If I’m the governor or the president pro tem of the state Senate, I’d be laser-focused on the California constitution to figure out how I can circle the wagons around the issues Californians care about.”

Californians clearly care about sanctuary cities. They want the practice to end.

Jessica Vaughan, a director of policy studies for the Washington DC-based Center for Immigration Studies noted:

“This irresponsible legislation has already caused the release of thousands of criminals that U.S. Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement was trying to deport. Now it may also cost California police and sheriffs critical funding from the federal government. Last year, these grants were worth more than $130 million.”

It’s hard to get 50% of Californians to agree the Sun sets in the West, to get 74% to want an end to sanctuary city policies, speaks volumes.

Photo Credit: ChameleonsEye / shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Poll: Most Californians Want an End to Sanctuary Cities

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us