Skip to content
Subscribe

In Political Discourse, Social Media Has No Shortage of Armchair Quarterbacks

Published:

There is no question that social networks sites like Twitter, Facebook, and Google Plus have revolutionized the way we not only communicate on a global scale, but the way we acquire and process information. As a society, we are always looking for ways to get our information faster.

The latest generation of smartphone has to allow people to get their information a nanosecond faster than the previous generation or else it is inefficient. We expect to get our news in 140 characters or less, which can often result in important information taking a backseat to the information that will garner the most clicks.Having such instantaneous access to information can be beneficial, but it can also be harmful as frequent IVN guest contributor

Michael Austin pointed out in an article published on April 22, 2014. In the article, Austin discusses a prediction from Plato over two millennia ago that the invention of writing and universal literacy would ultimately be detrimental to human memory.

He was right and the more access we have to information, the less we rely on our ability to retain knowledge and information, which leads to a society full of people with short attention spans. Social media has a negative effect on people's ability to focus on the long-term, which -- as Austin points out -- will have affect policy making decisions.

The rise of social media has also given rise to the political armchair quarterback.

This is not just a small handful of people, but thousands of people expressing themselves on a stage where all information presented is treated equally. Political commentary is then shared and retweeted so that it reverberates through ideological echo chambers of like-minded people to re-enforce these thoughts and opinions until they are treated by some as absolute truth.

This is what Paul Taylor in The Next America: Boomers, Millennials, and the Looming Generational Showdown refers to as a modern day Plato's Cave, something that began with the emergence of cable news:

Perception gaps are as ancient as the shadows on the wall of Plato’s famous cave. But lately they’ve taken on an explicitly partisan cast— a development fueled by a change in the norms of journalism, from an era when neutral fact-based reporting was the highest calling to one in which the brightest stars in the media firmament are paid to deliver their facts premixed with partisan commentary.

Cable news quickly became a place where partisan "truth" is treated as a substitute for objective "Truth," so much so that people now ignore experts to listen to what mainstream media personalities have to say. Social media gives these personalities an even wider audience -- a larger outlet for their "truth."People have become so comfortable with the shadows on the wall that they immediately reject anyone who tries to open their eyes to the realities of the world around them.

Twitter creates an environment where the scientist with years of experience in climate research is put on the same stage as the political commentator who denies climate change and has zero experience in any type of science. The opinions of a professor with a post-doctorate in Economics is lost in an ocean of tweets from people with little experience in the field or severely limited knowledge of economic theories. A person with decades of experience in foreign relations is treated the same as a person who has never even traveled out of their own state.

Everyone is free to express their opinion, but not all opinions should be treated equally. The problem with social media is the biggest microphones end up in the hands of the wrong people.

This is the problem with contemporary political discourse. We can't hear what the experts have to say because partisan commentators are shouting as loud as they can to drown them out. They tell people to ignore the scientist, the former general, the ambassador with 20 years of foreign relations experience, the economist with the Ph.D, and to listen to them instead -- and people do.

Social media has just given these partisan talking heads a larger echo chamber to reverberate their message.

Photo Source: Business Insider

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

In Political Discourse, Social Media Has No Shortage of Armchair Quarterbacks

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us