Skip to content
Subscribe

News Distorting Truth Makes Voters Sick of Politics

Published:

More and more people, including the bi-partisan media keep asking why voters, in general, are so sick of politics. Almost all the discussion and all the solutions center around political issues or ideology. But rarely does anyone ask: is the average voter an "issue-oriented" voter?  Does the average American go about their day thinking about what a staunch capitalist or awesome liberal they are? And, a more important question, is it rational for a regular everyday American to step away from their kids, stop watching the olympics, to set their work aside, and to push pause on the things that bring happiness into their lives to sift through the garble that pervades our political dialogue?

I prides myself in being politically aware. But, I rarely have time to delve into issues as deeply as it takes to truly understand them. So, it is easy to rely on others for the latest scoop. But, I increasingly find myself at every hyperbolized tweet and every sensational headline thinking, OK, well who is this coming from and what is the full story?

Just today, while looking through my Twitter feed, and Reddit, and Fox News, and MSNBC and a bunch of other places to find out whats going on, it made me sick. From Republicans saying that Obama just said he wants to provide bailouts for all American industries, to Democrats claiming that Ann Coulter said Fox admitted to being owned by Romney, there is so much distortion of the truth in the political dialogue. If you look at what Obama said, or listen to the video, its pretty clear that these "news stories" are misleading.  Yet, the article from Crooks and Liars gets over 1,700 'upvotes' on Reddit and the misleading Obama quote gets a huge Red Headline on Drudge Report.

Undoubtably, millions of people read these headlines and commentaries.  Assuredly, many of them go on to repeat the distortions to their family and friends who care a little bit less then them.  Like a game of telephone, those misquotes get passed around, and the average person hears a story, which, they know is not the full truth.

Why would a musician want to sift through this spin for the full context? Why would the average soccer mom want to participate in a discussion of distortion? Why would an independent-minded voter want to support candidates that are, at the end of the day, representatives of the respective "left and right" sides of the modern debate? When both sides of the debate refuse to address the other-side in a respectful and truthful manner, why do you think normal people are sick of politics?

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

News Distorting Truth Makes Voters Sick of Politics

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us