Skip to content
Subscribe

Majority of Independents open to third party candidate for President

Published:

A  new survey conducted by Public Policy Polling has found that 37% of  Americans and 51% of Independents are open to supporting a third party  candidate for President in 2012.  And there is good reason to believe these  numbers significantly underestimate the level of support for an alternative to the  Democrats and Republicans.

According  to the poll, which was released last week and conducted between January  14th and January 16th, 37% of Americans are open to the idea of  supporting a third party candidate for President in 2012, while 45% are  not and 18% are not sure.  Of those who are open to a third party  alternative to President Obama and his eventual Republican challenger,  48% express support for a centrist candidate who is more conservative  than Democrats and more liberal than Republicans, while 30% want a  candidate who is more conservative than Republicans and 16% want a  candidate who is more liberal than the Democrats.  The remainder express  support for “something else” or are not sure.  These numbers translate  roughly to an 18-19% base-level support for a centrist, third party  candidate among the electorate at large.

A  look at the poll’s crosstabs shows that Independents are,  unsurprisingly, most open to a third party candidate for President in  2012.  51% of Independents expressed openness to the idea, compared to  44% of Republicans and only 24% of Democrats.  Given that Independents  and Republicans are much more open to the idea of a third party  candidate for President than Democrats are, there is good reason to  believe that the Public Policy Polling survey significantly  underestimates the level of support for an alternative to the deadlock  of Democratic-Republican party politics.

40%  of the PPP survey’s respondents were Democrats, 37% were Republicans  and 23% were Independent or “Other.” However, numerous polls conducted  over the last two years have found that more Americans now identify  themselves as Independents than as Republicans or Democrats.  A Pew Research survey from last November found that 37% of respondents identified  themselves as Independents, compared with 30% who identified themselves as  Democrats, and 26% who said they are Republicans.  Similarly, an  analysis by the Gallup organization from early January found that the percentage of Americans identifying  themselves as Independents increased to 38% over the course of 2010,  compared with only 31% who identified themselves as Democrats and 29% as  Republicans.

Furthermore,  a number of other surveys from this past fall indicate majority support  for a third party or Independent alternative to the Democrats and  Republicans.  A NYT/CBS poll from last September, for instance, found that 54% say the country needs a third party.  Similarly, a poll commissioned by The Hill in October found that 54% of respondents desired an alternative to the  Democratic and Republican parties, including 67% of Independents, 49% of  Democrats and 46% of Republicans.

Reflecting  on the PPP survey’s disparity between Democratic and Republican support  for a third party presidential candidate in 2012, Tom Jensen wrote at  the Public Policy Polling blog:

“That should be a big red flag for the GOP when it comes to the  possibility of nominating someone who the party base doesn't see as  sufficiently conservative. Republican voters in Nevada, Alaska,  Delaware, and Colorado this year showed they were willing to lose  general elections to prove a point to the more centrist wing of their  party.”

However,  as is often the case in matters of this sort, the situation is likely  more complicated than such an assessment would make it appear.  A recent  Rasmussen poll found that 46% of GOP primary voters would likely support a third party candidate if Sarah Palin did not win the Republican party’s nomination for President.  But a Rasmussen poll from late last year found that 31% of GOP primary voters would likely support a third party candidate if Sarah Palin did indeed win the Republican party’s nomination for President.

Since  Rasmussen is widely considered to be a Republican-leaning polling  organization and Public Policy Polling is often said to lean toward the  Democrats, as its sampling in the present poll would suggest, an  obvious question arises: where are the polling organizations that lean  toward Independents?

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Majority of Independents open to third party candidate for President

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us