Skip to content
Sign up free
Live Live

Election night: get email alerts

Ranked Choice Voting

It's Official: Both Parties Oppose Ranked Choice Voting

It's Official: Both Parties Oppose Ranked Choice Voting
Image: Kelly Sikkema on Unsplash

Both the Democratic and Republican national committees are now opposing ranked choice voting, with the DNC set to vote Saturday on banning it in 2028 primaries even in states where voters approved it.

By Shawn Griffiths

6-minute read

On Saturday, the Democratic National Committee is scheduled to meet, during which its membership body will vote on a proposal to ban ranked choice voting in the party’s 2028 nomination proceedings—even in states where voters have made the reform law.

The party is getting encouragement to do this, but not from its members. It is being cheered on by people on the other side of the political aisle.

In an op-ed in the conservative-leaning National Review, Save Our States executive director and ranked choice voting critic Trent England makes the case that the Democratic Party should do what Republicans have done in several states and approve a ranked choice voting ban.

“This is causing an understandable uproar, since progressive and socialist Democrats are the ones pushing RCV around the country,” England writes.

“The DNC would be right to take a stand against it, since RCV — like many other ‘election reforms’ — makes the election process more difficult, less meaningful, and harder to trust.”

England writes a lot about the added complexity under ranked choice voting compared to first-past-the-post. He talks about how ballots will come with more instruction and how voting will be slower because voters rank candidates instead of just choosing a single person.

He talks about the phenomenon of ballot exhaustion, which happens when all of the candidates a voter has ranked have been eliminated and thus their ballot doesn’t count toward the final results (something studies have shown represent a small fraction of ballots under RCV).

“Perhaps this is why 19 states have laws banning RCV in their elections,” England writes. However, he doesn’t mention that all 19 are Republican-controlled states that have no history of using ranked choice voting in their elections.

Thus, the bans do not come from any experience with the reform. They exist simply because of a common position among Republican officials to oppose ranked choice voting. A position many Democratic leaders and insiders also share.

The DNC ranked choice voting ban was proposed and approved by the party’s Rules and Bylaws Committee (RBC) in May. It amends the stipulations for delegate selection and allocation in two specific ways:

  1. Ranked choice voting would be prohibited in presidential primaries and caucuses; and
  2. In states where ranked choice voting is law, the party will only consider first-choice totals for delegate selection and allocation.

So, even in jurisdictions where voters have approved ranked choice voting—like in Maine and with 73% support in DC—the full use of it will be prohibited by the party, rendering it effectively pointless in presidential preference elections.

If approved by the entire DNC body, the ban will mirror the ranked choice voting ban already adopted by the Republican National Committee.

DNC Could Ban Ranked Choice Voting in 2028
Maine and Washington, D.C. may still use ranked ballots, but Democrats would allocate delegates as though voters never ranked anyone beyond first place.

The argument by those pushing the ban, like RBC member Frank Leone, is ranked choice voting is incompatible with the party’s delegate selection process because it is used in single-winner elections.

Presidential primaries and caucuses are not single-winner. Party rules dictate that any candidate who gets over 15% of the vote in a presidential preference election—be it a primary or caucus—can add to their delegate count.

However, while the ban initially flew under the radar, it has garnered more attention over the last couple of weeks, especially from long-time reform advocates like Kyle Bailey, who points out that there are multiple ways to use ranked choice voting.

For example, any candidate who falls under 15% in an election can be eliminated and their voters’ next applicable choices would count toward how many delegates the remaining candidates get rather than not counting at all.

Six state Democratic Parties have already used ranked choice voting in presidential cycles: Alaska, Hawaii, Kansas, Maine, Nevada, and Wyoming. This means the RBC has already approved the use of ranked choice voting systems.

Its members did not determine the reform to be incompatible in 2020 and 2024.

Further, former FairVote CEO and President of Expand Democracy Rob Richie points out on IVN that ranked choice voting is popular among Democratic voters (and not just progressives) who have used the reform.

“A recent University of New Hampshire poll found that among registered Democrats in Maine, the state’s RCV law is supported by an overwhelming 84% to 6% margin,” Richie writes. Yet party insiders are still pushing the ban anyway.

Reports on the proposal, including on IVN, have put more focus on it, which may be why the DNC chair removed the public RBC meeting on Thursday and replaced it with a private, closed-door dinner.

“As a member of the DNC Executive Committee, I cannot over-stress my disappointment in turning an open debate into a closed door session,” Christine Pelosi tweeted.

“I will take the fight for ranked choice voting to the Executive Committee and will join in the floor fight on Saturday as these are the only options available. We need radical transparency to restore trust. This ain’t it!”

Republicans like to call ranked choice voting a “Democrat reform” (as well as a “communist” and “socialist” reform), but Democratic officials and party insiders have a history of opposing the reform as well.

Democrats in Nevada, for example, opposed a citizen-led ballot measure in 2024 that offered both nonpartisan primaries and ranked choice voting. They made the same argument as England that the voting method was too complex.

Notably, surveys in jurisdictions that use ranked choice voting find that most voters say it is simple, fair, and easy. What’s more, once they try it, they tend to support continued use.

In Redondo Beach, California, 61% of voters supported ranked choice voting after first using it in 2024. A 2024 poll across San Francisco, Oakland, Berkeley, and San Leandro found that 70% of voters said they wanted to keep using it as well.

These voters represent more than what Trent England calls an “RCV-supporting fringe.”

The Democratic majority in the Colorado Legislature amended an election administration bill that same year to make it harder to adopt ranked choice voting at the state level. Like the DNC, they did this without voter input.

In Maine, Democratic officials like Governor Janet Mills and former Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap opposed implementation and expansion of ranked choice voting. In DC, the Democratic Party sued to block Initiative 83, the 2024 measure approved by 73% of voters.

Why Trump Really Hates Alaska’s Ranked Choice Voting
President Trump called Alaska’s ranked choice voting system “disastrous” and “very fraudulent” on Friday. He gave his “complete and total support” to the repeal effort heading to Alaska’s 2026 ballot.

Now, the DNC looks like it may move forward with a ban supported by President Donald Trump and the Republican Party. It is supported by GOP-aligned megadonors like Elon Musk, who has committed over a million dollars to repeal the nonpartisan election system in Alaska.

It is a system that includes ranked choice voting in the general election.

The reason both parties oppose ranked choice voting, as revealed by party insiders speaking anonymously, goes beyond perceived issues of complexity or transparency or voter confidence.

According to the Bipartisan Policy Center, opposition to nonpartisan election reforms, whether it is all-candidate open primaries or ranked choice voting, has to do with reduced certainty over election outcomes.

Party insiders know how to win under the current system. The elections are more predictable, party leaders have more control over candidates, and aligned-special interests have more impact with every dollar they spend.

Nonpartisan election reforms have a documented history of making elections less predictable and more competitive. The parties don’t like that—even if these reforms have support from a majority of their voters.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

It's Official: Both Parties Oppose Ranked Choice Voting

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us