Skip to content
Subscribe

Government Could Prosecute Author Trying to Protect American Consumers

Published:

An author who is attempting to expose security vulnerabilities to consumers could face a lawsuit from the government for his efforts.

Matthew Green, an assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins University Information Security Institute, is writing a book tentatively titled, Practical Cryptographic Engineering. However, in obtaining research data for this project, Green could be violating copyright law. The digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed an order last Thursday against the government to not prosecute Green.

Green's research seeks to expose the weaknesses in computer programs that make them vulnerable to hackers.

However, it also requires that he work directly with computer code which is protected by U.S. copyright law. While normally such research would be classified as "fair use," computer researchers can be penalized for selling such a book. Green's findings have implications for customers' smartphones, ATMs, and other electronic devices.

The EFF first filed lawsuit on Green's behalf in July. Significantly, the EFF challenges the constitutionality of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). The act institutes prohibitions on discussion of copyrighted material. According to Section 1201 of the U.S. Copyright code, it is:

"...illegal to circumvent technological measures used to prevent unauthorized access to copyrighted works, including copyrighted books, movies, videos, video games, computer programs."

If the lawsuit is successful, the EFF could demonstrate that the DMCA's provisions are violations of the First Amendment.

Green says his work is vital for protecting consumers. Yet companies' self-interest could prevent his and others' research from helping those clients. Green said on his blog in July:

"Companies use the courts to silence researchers who have embarrassing things to say about their products, or who uncover too many of those products' internal details."

The U.S. Justice Department wants the court to dismiss the EFF's lawsuit. Rather, the Justice Department claims Green and the EFF lack the standing to make the suit. They make this charge because to date there has not been a threat of prosecution.

Although if prosecuted, Green and anyone doing research like his face onerous penalties which can include a five-year imprisonment.

According to EFF attorney Kit Walsh, the research of Professor Matthew Green is an important public service. She says, "If we want our communications and devices to be secure, we need to protect independent security researchers like Dr. Green."

Photo Credit: wk1003mike / shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Government Could Prosecute Author Trying to Protect American Consumers

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us