Skip to content
Subscribe

Field Poll: voters approve of Governor Brown, disapprove of legislature

Published:

As California Gov. Jerry Brown seems to be revealing his Independent approach, a Field poll released this week indicates that he's receiving relatively strong support from both partisans and non-partisans. In addition, the poll hints at the possibility that more voters could be receptive toward joining California's burgeoning Independent fold.

Field shows that by 49% to 32%, the state's non-partisans approve of the way the governor is handling his duties. The sentiment of Californians overall who approve of Governor Brown is exactly aligned with the sentiment of these Independents by the same percentage points.

A somewhat similar pattern can be seen among both voter demographics in their sentiments towards the California legislature, only this time, it's in a largely negative light rather than a positive one. Among non-partisans, approval of the legislature lies at 19%. With voters overall, approval is at 20%. The decline of confidence in the California legislature has plummeted from the average 43% approval rating that its leaders held back in 1983.

No doubt California's legislature has fallen on hard terms with the people that it represents- and it's not just one party or the other that's been the problem with voters. Approval of both parties among non-partisan and overall voters remains very low and relatively identical.  Nearly two out of three California voters continue to believe that their state is moving in the wrong direction. Over the last three years, that belief has fluctuated between 70% and 81%.  At present, a meager 24% of the state's voters believe that California is headed in the right direction.

Perhaps the clearest indication that California's Independent movement is ripe to attract even more voters is that majorities across the partisan divide believe that the state is on the wrong track.  With the governor's relatively strong standing among the state's Independent electorate, perhaps this is his time to put aside any remaining partisan baggage he may have and build on the momentum of catalyzing genuine progress in California.

The Field Poll survey was conducted September 1-12, 2011 among a random sample of 1,001 voters in California. To cover a broad range of issues and minimize respondent fatigue, some questions were asked of a random subsample of 520 voters. The maximum sampling error estimates for results based on overall registered voters was +/-3.2 percentage points with a 95% confidence level. Findings based on voters included in the random subsample had a maximum sampling error of +/-4.4 percentage points.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Field Poll: voters approve of Governor Brown, disapprove of legislature

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us