Skip to content
Subscribe

Election 2012, the Lack of New Ideas, and Undecided Voters

Published:

The 2012 campaign started in 2008. Arguably, it became a personal battle between Obama and anyone else around the time Mitch McConnell argued that defeating the President was more important than governance. Since then, they’ve armed their tanks with fear of isms: communism, socialism, welfarism, marxism. Undecided voters have been stuck in the middle or out on the edges; we can't decide.

The new way forward, says the red team, is lower taxes, less regulation, and a respect for the Constitution. The details of this vision have been obscured by the fears and supplemented by a fist against the chest declaring an elevated inner Americanism than the blue team. Create jobs. Cut red tape. Lower taxes. America!

The blue team doesn’t use isms. They pick more positive terms: hope, forward, progress, and change. The details of their visions are backward looking; fear of the President of yesterday, the policies of the past, and the perpetuation of class-warfare. Protect minorities. Support women. Give us our fair share. America!

The decision we are told to make is to choose a red America or a blue one. Two America’s that put forward presidential candidates that don’t even talk about a Patriot Act that has restricted the freedoms we trumpet across the world for over a decade. Two teams that talk about foreign policy in terms of who is more dedicated to our trillion dollar a year operations in the face of $16 trillion dollar debt. Two partisans who have treated debate moderators in a way that would make grandma cringe.  Two candidates that have appealed to independents by telling them how scary the other guy is.

Neither candidate has suggested a real idea to solve the problems like Wall Street. Maybe a super-short term tax to penalize the split-second traders who treat the market like a poker table instead of the investment center it was meant to be? Neither has suggested a real plan to democratize the world in a more peaceful manner, like building schools and infrastructure instead of dropping bombs and billions. Neither has suggested that drug education may be more effective than a drug war. Whatever the solution to our problems, where are the real ideas?

As the partisan consultants and candidates search for that last minute talking point, pollsters and pundits brand the undecided voter as a low-information voter. Perhaps many undecided voters are just waiting for a last minute idea.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Election 2012, the Lack of New Ideas, and Undecided Voters

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us