Skip to content
Subscribe

Despite High Praises, Illinois Governor Vetoes Bipartisan Marijuana Reform

Published:

With the governor's veto of a bipartisan effort to alter existing drug laws, the Illinois marijuana reform movement is left to consider its options.

Calling the "criminal prosecution of cannabis possession" a "drain on public resources," Governor Bruce Rauner, a Republican, vetoed House Bill 218, amending the Cannabis Control Act.

Although saying, "I support the fundamental purposes of this bill," Rauner still issued his veto, but offered his own amendments for the General Assembly to consider.

The legislation originally called for fines ranging from $55 to $125 for ten grams or less of marijuana. The legislation also aimed to reduce non-medical marijuana possession to a civil offense rather than a misdemeanor. Under current Illinois law, the parameters of a Class B misdemeanor of possession cuts off at ten grams.

While HB 218 would change current law to make possession of up to 15 grams a civil violation, Rauner believes the classification of a Class B misdemeanor shouldn't change:

"Leaving the delineation at 10 grams will still accomplish the bill's fundamental purposes. . . .83% of the arrests in 2014 for possession of up to 30 grams were for possession of less than 10 grams. Therefore, providing a civil law violation for possession of up to 10 grams will still dramatically reduce the number of arrests."

Rauner's veto likely upset many on both sides of the political aisle because upon entering office, the governor made it a top priority to reduce the number of people in Illinois jails by 25% and reduce court costs.

State Rep. Kelly Cassidy, a Chicago Democrat, told the Chicago Tribune that she and other supporters of the bill would regroup. She also questioned the changes the governor wants:

"It really comes down to with every change you make, someone gets arrested who wouldn't otherwise. And if we want to keep people out of our jail system we have to take bold moves, and does putting someone in jail for 10 grams instead of 15 grams make us safer? I would argue it doesn't."

However, Jason Barickman, a Republican supportive of Illinois marijuana reform, was more optimistic, saying:

"This is a significant change in public policy. We want to get it right. . . . The governor is expressing his opinion on that, which helps us move the ball forward."

The governor's veto comes at a time when he is in the middle of a partisan battle with the heavily-Democratic legislature over the state budget. However, the proposal to reform Illinois' marijuana laws had strong bipartisan support.

The General Assembly has fifteen days from the beginning of the next session to accept or reject the changes. If the governor's changes are rejected, the current law will remain in place.

Photo Source: AP

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Despite High Praises, Illinois Governor Vetoes Bipartisan Marijuana Reform

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us