Skip to content
Sign up free
News

The Defense of Marriage?

By Samuel Genson

1-minute read

In the wake of the Supreme Court ruling on the Defense of Marriage Act (more commonly referred to as DOMA), Conservatives across the country are up in arms. As a Conservative, this baffles me to some degree. Conservatives are supposed to believe in smaller government, not overreaching, allowing more choices to be made by the individual states not an overarching federal government. However, that does not stop many Conservatives from being upset because they want smaller government on their terms. This seems to be the latest instance of just such a matter.

Few would dispute that California is different from Indiana, that New York is not the same as South Dakota.

I typically do not write about social issues...and I view this as a social issue. The fact is that this is a BIG deal though. To some, it is life changing decision the Supreme Court made. Some will say that this ruling "ruins traditional marriage". The problem with that argument is that traditional marriage has been in ruins long before this.

Since the year 2000, the marriage rate has been on the decline from 8.2 marriages per 1000 people to 6.8 per 1000 in 2011.  In 2000, the divorce rate was 4.0 divorces per 1000 people, dropping to 3.6 per 1000 in 2011. Even though the divorce rate declined over that span it actually increased when compared to marriages. Clearly, more people are choosing to live a life without marriage.

While gay people could be a threat to the "sanctity of marriage", I doubt that anyone will notice since heterosexuals are busy destroying marriage already. Gay divorces will happen. Gay custody hearings will occur. Given the rough estimate of gay & lesbian people in the United States - taking an assumption that heterosexual numbers hold true in gay marriages - this would only be a 3.5% increase in court cases.

The reactions to this ruling in the 50 states will vary widely. Some states will move to create laws that set marriage as being between two consenting adults, regardless of sex.  Others will adopt amendments to their constitutions that deem marriage as only that which is between one man and one woman. One thing is very certain though, with the Supreme Court striking down DOMA, a whole host of battles will now arise throughout the nation.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

The Defense of Marriage?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us