Skip to content
Subscribe

Debt ceiling debacle highlights Democrat-Republican dysfunctionality

Published:

Despite  their reservations and concerns, many Americans are undoubtedly  breathing a sigh of relief following the seemingly manufactured crisis that finally allowed passage of a last minute deal to yet again raise the nation’s debt ceiling.   The professional partisans of the Democratic and Republican parties,  on the other hand, continue to hyperventilate.

Americans do not appear impressed by the results of the debt ceiling negotiations between the White House and congressional leaders in the Democratic and Republican parties. A CNN poll (.pdf) conducted on Monday gauging public opinion on the bipartisan  agreement reached over the weekend found that Americans disapprove of  the plan 52% to 44%. Indeed, a slim majority of 51% disapproved of the  fact that the debt ceiling was raised at all.  While Independents and  Republicans opposed raising the debt ceiling by fairly wide margins (61% and  64% respectively), Democrats were generally much more supportive, with 74% giving their stamp of approval.

Respondents across partisan lines were much more supportive of the spending cuts included in the  agreement.  72% of Republicans, 68% of Democrats, 60% of Independents  favored cuts that would reduce government spending by around one  trillion dollars over the next ten years.

In  the weeks leading up to the Tuesday deadline, the President stressed  over and over again that he supported a “balanced approach” that would  both cut spending and raise taxes.  However, the final plan does not  include any tax increases for big business or high income earners.  60%  of respondents disapproved of the fact that spending cuts were not  paired with any such tax code reforms, including 77% of Democrats and  59% of Independents.  Republicans, on the other hand, were  overwhelmingly supportive of this aspect of the agreement: 61% approved  while 39% disapproved.

Among  Democrats and Republicans, perceptions of how the President and  congressional leaders of both parties dealt with the debt negotiations are falling out along predictable partisan lines.  Democrats strongly approved  of the way President Obama and congressional Democrats handled the  process, while Republicans strongly disapproved.  On the other hand,  Republicans strongly approved of the way congressional Republicans  handled the negotiations, while Democrats held the opposite view.

Independents,  however, disapproved of the way the process was handled by all parties  to the process.  58% disapproved of President Obama’s handling of the  crisis, 69% disapproved of congressional Republicans' negotiating  strategy and 71% disapproved of the way Democratic leaders in  Congress comported themselves throughout.

These  results are not surprising given that, unlike Democrats and  Republicans, Independents have virtually no representation in the  Congress.  This simple, glaring fact did not go unnoticed by cable  news media, which typically exclude Independents from their debates and discussions.   CNN’s Don Lemon, for instance, invited a number of Independent  activists onto his program to discuss the marginalization of Independents over the course of the rancorous debt ceiling negotiations.  Lemon even went so far as to basically admit the mainstream media’s complicity in this  state of affairs, introducing the segment by noting that the Independent  panel, which included Joe Gandelman of The Moderate Voice, Nicole Neily  of the Independent Women’s Forum and Professor Omar Ali, had not been  invited onto the program since February 2010.

“There’s  lots of talk about the extremes dominating the debt limit debate, so  where’s the independent voice in all of this?” asked Lemon. “The  Independent voice is getting edged out as the center is clearly under  attack,” said Gandelman. “We’ve been left out of the process for so  long because both sides have been able to buy votes,” said Neily.  “It’s  not getting any better,” she concluded, despite being encouraged by the  fact that there were no earmarks under consideration in the deal.

The  bipartisan agreement has certainly not created more amicable relations  between the partisans of the major parties. In recent days, Democratic  party ideologues have compared Republicans to terrorists and Republican party ideologues have wished Democrats to hell.

“Voters  may have chosen divided government but they sure didn’t vote for  dysfunctional government,” said the President yesterday.  With each  passing day, it seems to become more and more evident that a vote for  Democrats and Republicans is indeed a vote for dysfunctional government,  whether divided or not.  Is it any wonder that Americans are leaving  the major parties in droves?

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Debt ceiling debacle highlights Democrat-Republican dysfunctionality

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us