Skip to content
Subscribe

Congressional approval rating reaches new low

Published:

Though the country remains evenly split on its assessment of the President, there is little disagreement with regard to the Congress.  Just 9% of Americans approve of the way Congress is handling its job, according to a recent poll by CBS News and The New York Times, an historic low demonstrating deep discontent with the Democratic and Republican parties.

Asked whether they approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as President, respondents to the poll were evenly split overall, with 46% saying they approve and 46% saying they disapprove.  Predictably, the responses of Democrats and Republicans were basically mirror images of one another. 85% of Republicans disapproved of the President's job performance, while 78% of Democrats approved.

Independents, on the other hand, more closely approximated the breakdown of the sample as a whole, though they leaned toward disapproval. 42% of Indepenents stated they approve of the job the President is doing, while 47% disapproved.

Querying respondents as to whether they approve or disapprove of the way the Congress is handling its job, the survey found a broad nonpartisan consensus that something is deeply wrong with the federal legislature, in which the House is controlled by Republicans and the Senate by Democrats. Overall, 84% of respondents said they disapprove of the way Congress is handling its job, compared to just 9% who said they approve.  This breakdown was consistent across partisan lines: 83% of Republicans, 83% of Democrats and 85% of Independents voiced disapproval of Congress.

Few Americans have any trust in the federal government to do the right thing on any given matter.  Only 10% of those surveyed said they trust the government in Washington DC to do what is right all or most of the time, while 89% stated that the federal government can be trusted to do what is right only sometimes or never.

Independents were most likely to never trust the government in Washington DC to do the right thing.  17% of Independents said the federal government can never be trusted to do what is right, compared to 14% of Republicans and 6% of Democrats.

Independents were, understandably, most likely to be skeptical of both Republican and Democratic party economic proposals.  60% of Independents said they do not think the President has a clear plan to create jobs, and 75% said the same of Republicans in Congress.  Like the majority of Americans, Independent respondents to the survey supported investments in infrastructure, and tax cuts and reduced regulations for small businesses.  They opposed tax cuts for large corporations.

The poll of 1650 adults nationwide was conducted by telephone from October 19-24, and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3%.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Congressional approval rating reaches new low

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us