Skip to content
Subscribe

Chipotle feels the squeeze as the Obama administration flexes its immigration enforcement muscles

Published:

Contrary to the perception that Republicans are the only ones desiring a return to strict workplace immigration enforcement, the Wall Street Journal and others are reporting that immigration authorities under President Obama are utilizing harsh measures with popular restaurant chains like Chipotle.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the chain has been forced to let go of hundreds of workers in recent weeks after the company received many notices from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) of "suspect documents" for those very workers.  In other words, suspected actions on the part of those suspended workers may have included presenting fake social security numbers or using someone else's number as their own. The government agency will perform audits of these stores to ensure that workers are legitimately allowed to work lawfully. There is no indication that Chipotle knew of such illegal activity.

Current stores in the crosshairs of the ongoing ICE investigation are in Minnesota and also include others in Washington DC and Virginia. Stores in California are not on ICE's watch at the moment, the report said.

The Journal reports that in the recent fiscal year ending in September, the agency had conducted audits of more than 2,740 U.S. companies.  This was double the amount of the previous year's audits. Fines against illegal activities of businesses amounted to record amounts as well, the Journal states.

In an effort to give a voice to those in opposition to Chipotle's actions, the Los Angeles Times published a response to Chipotle's action from a policy advocate on behalf of an immigration rights group in Southern California that has been previously covered here at CAIVN.

"While we're happy that high-profile raids have decreased, the government has shifted to another enforcement-only approach," Carl Bergquist, of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, told the Times.

Mr. Bergquist said that companies like Chipotle are put on the spot and that wokers' livelihoods are lost as a result.

Chris Arnold, spokesperson for Chipotle, told the Times that more employee firings are likely to come. In late January, when Chipotle was also being audited by ICE, Arnold said that the company will ultimately comply with government officials on the matter.  Despite the chain's cooperation with government officials, the restaurant faced protests over allegations that workers weren't fully informed of the reasons for their firings.

The Chipotle ordeal demonstrates that not only is the Obama administration cracking down on illegal immigration at the border, but also at more local levels as well. As noted, the number of workplace enforcement measures is higher this year than it was last year under President Obama.

So, for news publications like the Los Angeles Times to suggest that it is simply Republicans who want to return to strict workplace enforcement is an unfair and inaccurate assessment.  In putting forth this narrative, such reporting plays a factor in leading to a misinformed public on the issue of the federal government tackling illegal immigration.

In tackling the effective responsibility of enforcement at the workplace level, the administration is in part ensuring that illegal immigrants do not take the jobs that should rightfully go to qualified and legal Americans. Furthermore. this means that immigration agents under Obama are also getting a handle on fraudulent acts such as the supplying of fake information by illegal immigrants.

Ultimately, while the Democratic Party would like to portray itself as more lenient on allowing immigrants to remain in the country, the truth is the Obama administration is stepping-up its efforts to fight illegal immigration.  Likewise, while Republicans would like to portray themselves as tougher on immigration enforcement than the current President, the facts are making it difficult to make such a claim.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Chipotle feels the squeeze as the Obama administration flexes its immigration enforcement muscles

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us