Skip to content
Subscribe

California's Tea Party voters more engaged than non-partisans and Democrats

Published:

A Field poll study sampling 950 registered California voters shows that the state's Tea Party-affiliated voters follow what's going on most of the time in government more than Democrats and voters classified as "Non-partisans/others."

Among the segment of voters who identify with the Tea Party, 77% of them follow "most of the time" what's going on with their government and public office. With those who identify somewhat with the Tea Party, 46% follow what their government. A mere 5% of Tea Party members in the state hardly follow what their government is doing.

Engagement among those who "don't identify" with the Tea Party drops drastically, with 35% who say that they follow the news most of the time.  More specifically, only 30% of Californians who identify as non-partisan voters (which is a separate category from the Tea Party) and 41% of Democrats follow the news "most of the time."

The findings on the Tea Party's serious engagement in California politics trails only those voters identifying as Republicans, the party from which the grassroots-led movement has established a noticeable separation on certain occasions.

Those who followed the news at least of the some of the time also remained low, ranging between 30% and 40% among the top three political affiliations. The percentage of individuals who "now and then/ hardly" keep up with their government was highest among those classified as non-partisan voters/other (30%), making them the most disengaged group compared to Republicans and Democrats.

The trend of how much California voters as a whole are following public activities has been on the decline since 1979, the Field study notes. As the amount of California voters who kept up with their government, either most or some of the time, has gone down, the amount of those who keep up now and then or hardly at all has been on the rise over this same time period.

As for the source of their news, a majority (56%) of Californians get their news from television. Following television, 44% of the state's registered voters get their information from the internet. Newspapers, radio, magazines, and other media follow far behind these two influential news mediums in the state. As for the type of news consumed, CNN was the most-watched source for Democrats and non-partisans. Meanwhile, Fox News was the primary source for the state's Republicans.

While the Tea Party might have only a small presence in the Golden State, what's indicated by this poll is that it is one of the most engaged voter groups.  Let's hope that more voters will rise up in order to hold both Democrats and Republicans accountable for California's current woes.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California's Tea Party voters more engaged than non-partisans and Democrats

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us