Skip to content
Sign up free
Live Live

Election night: get email alerts

News

Bill to Protect Minors Online Passes Senate, Moves on to Assembly

By Shawn Griffiths

2-minute read

protect minors online

Tomislav Konestabo / Shutterstock.com

Despite opposition from major Internet companies like Facebook and Google, the California Senate passed a bill on Thursday that would require social networking sites to remove identifying information from a user's online profile at the request of the user or -- in the case of a minor -- at the request of a parent. The bill, SB 501, was approved with a 23-10 vote.

SB 501, authored by Senate Majority Leader Ellen M. Corbett (D-San Leandro), requires social networking sites to comply with requests to remove sensitive identifying information like addresses, telephone numbers, bank account numbers, a registered user's Social Security number, and mother's maiden within 96 hours. Companies that fail to comply would face a fine of $10,000 for each offense.

“SB 501 empowers social networking website users—as well as parents of vulnerable minors using those sites—with a straightforward way of removing highly sensitive personal information from those websites,” Corbett said in a statement. "This common sense legislation covers only a specific list of sensitive personal information that serves no public benefit and, if improperly disclosed, endangers the safety of minor and adult site users.”

Corbett said the purpose of the bill is to protect California residents from crimes that can be committed by the wrong person obtaining the information, such as identity theft, stalking, kidnapping, and assault. She also noted that the legislation had strong support from law enforcement agencies and officials across the state.

“I cannot imagine why anyone would oppose the right of a parent of a 13-year-old child to request the prompt removal of that child’s social security number or home address from a social networking site," she included in her statement.

A coalition of social networking companies, including Google, Facebook, Tumblr, and Zynga, lobbied against the bill, saying it violates the free speech and privacy rights of teenagers. In a joint letter, the coalition said the law would "upset teenage consumers' expectation of privacy and 1st Amendment rights by allowing others to regulate their expression and content."

The companies also argue that the requirements the legislation imposes are unreasonable because it would be difficult to authenticate a request and verify the user is a California resident within the 96-hour time frame.

While supporters of SB 501 say it upholds the idea that technology -- especially social networking sites -- should encourage responsible parenting and not hinder it, opponents side with the Internet firms.

Among the dissenting votes was Senator Joel Anderson (R-Alpine), who said companies run the risk of losing ten grand every time a request is made, even if they apply their best efforts to comply with the law. Opponents of the bill, including Anderson, believe more time should be given to respond to requests from users or parents.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Bill to Protect Minors Online Passes Senate, Moves on to Assembly

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us