Skip to content
Sign up free
Campaign Finance

California Is Spending More on Ballot Measures Than the Rest of America Combined

California Is Spending More on Ballot Measures Than the Rest of America Combined

California is spending more than two-thirds of the $1.2 billion raised nationally for 2026 ballot measure campaigns, with record signature-gathering costs making it increasingly difficult for grassroots reform groups to reach voters.

By Shawn Griffiths

2-minute read

There are 164 statewide ballot measures in 2026. According to Ballotpedia, campaigns for and against them have raised more than $1.2 billion, which is closing in on the $1.33 billion raised during the entire 2024 presidential election cycle.

And one state accounts for the overwhelming majority of the money.

California Dominates the Spending

The money flowed in California this election cycle. According to Ballotpedia’s data, ballot measure campaigns in the state raised $798.9 million. This accounts for more than two-thirds of the national total.

It is also a new state record, surpassing the $763.7 million raised in 2020.

The two most expensive campaigns are:

  • Proposition 40, which would impose a one-time 5% wealth tax that the ballot measure says will fund health care, food assistance, and education. It has attracted $173.7 million total. Opponents have raised $140.5 million, more than four times the $33.2 million raised by supporters.
  • Proposition 42, which would prohibit certain new and retroactive taxes on personal assets, savings, and retirement holdings. It is essentially a counter to Prop 40 and has attracted another $172.7 million.

Notably, Google co-founder Sergey Brin contributed $102 million to the campaign opposing Proposition 40 and supporting Proposition 42.

Ballotpedia also reports that the Service Employees International Union–United Healthcare Workers West contributed $32 million to the opposite sides of those campaigns.

Outside California, Virginia ranks second with $107.6 million raised, followed by Missouri ($67.9 million), Colorado ($43.1 million), and Kansas ($29.4 million).

The Price of Getting on the Ballot Has Never Been Higher

The biggest takeaway from Ballotpedia's analysis for grassroots reform organizations isn’t the money spent persuading voters. It’s the money spent simply qualifying for the ballot.

A cost that is getting steeper each election cycle.

According to Ballotpedia, initiative campaigns spent a record $193.4 million on signature gathering in 2026, surpassing the previous record of $172.2 million in 2024.

On average, a successful petition drive cost $4.3 million compared to $3.25 million in 2024.

Once again California is a standout. Statewide campaigns spent $152.7 million collecting signatures, which is nearly 79% of the national total.

This highlights a growing challenge for political and election reform advocates without wealthy donors. Even when voters have the power to change laws directly, exercising that power requires millions of dollars before a single ballot is cast.

This is a reality that could prevent potential donors from committing before a campaign gets off the ground. It's a lot of money to gamble on something that could ultimately fail.

There are some exceptions. Ballotpedia identified five initiatives that qualified through volunteer signature-gathering efforts without reported petition-drive costs.

Still, the broader trend points to an uncomfortable reality about direct democracy in the US:

While the citizen initiative process was intended to give ordinary voters a way to drive policy change, getting an issue on the ballot is increasingly dependent on who can afford the small fortune needed to finance the effort.

And these aren’t even the final numbers for 2026.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California Is Spending More on Ballot Measures Than the Rest of America Combined

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us