Skip to content
Subscribe

A year later: a nation polarized by partisanship

Published:

Like George W. Bush, President Obama promised to unite a nation deeply divided by partisan politics.  However, a year into Obama's first term, America is more polarized than ever according to a Gallup Poll.

President Obama's first year stands as the most polarizing on record since polling commenced under President Dwight D. Eisenhower.  88% of Democrats approve of his performance, while only 23% of Republicans approve, representing a 65% partisan gap.  This far exceeds the 45% gap under Presidents George W. Bush and Ronald Reagan, and the 52% gap under President Bill Clinton.

Obama's independent voter approval rating stood at 42% just two weeks ago, a figure that hovers much closer to the GOP's paltry rating.  In addition, a Rasmussen poll reveals that only 30% of voters believe President Obama is governing as a bipartisan leader.

What gives?

Shouldn't Republican support be a bit stronger, especially since the GOP considers national security to be this nation's highest priority? After all, Obama has requested a record military budget (bigger than Bush's largest defense budget), escalated the AfPak war with two, new troop surges, ordered a record number of Predator Drone attacks, maintained a heavy troop presence in Iraq, and kept Guantanamo Bay open.  He supports the Patriot Act and exempted military spending from his proposed three-year domestic spending freeze.  On the other hand, shouldn't Democratic support be a bit weaker, especially since the Democratic Party positioned itself as the pro-civil liberties, anti-war antithesis to the Bush-Cheney administration?  In addition, Obama and a Democratic-led Congress have failed to stem the tide of double-digit unemployment, and have been unable to pass historic, binding legislation on healthcare reform and climate change.

Independents, like most Democrats and Republicans, appear to be moderately supportive of Obama on foreign policy, but high unemployment, record budget deficits, continued bailouts, and the attempted public option seem to have soured them for the most part.

So, is America facing yet another deeply polarizing political future?  Or, will Obama reclaim the mantle of bipartisanship and rebuild a more united, centrist nation?

Will it take a Republican take-over of Congress in the mid-term elections to institute a more bipartisan atmosphere in Washington DC, or will it simply exacerbate the already deep partisan divisions?

Or, is the foundation being laid for the rise of a viable 3rd party by 2012?

Readers, let us know what you think.  Inquiring minds want to know.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

A year later: a nation polarized by partisanship

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us