Skip to content
Sign up free
News

What Would YOU Do With $50 Billion?

By Susannah Kopecky

2-minute read

What would you do with $50 billion?

Would you balance a budget, and keep funds to spare? Would you hire more police and firefighters and/or increase their salaries? Would you invest heavily in infrastructure and restructuring a foundering education system? Funny thing is, with all of the many thousands of elected and appointed government officials throughout California, a consensus has yet to be reached on this question.

Theses are all questions California lawmakers must face in the near future, as a windfall of somewhere between $48 billion and $52 billion will fall into the laps of California governmental officials. This "gift" of sorts was provided through the nearly $800 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, AKA the "stimulus package."

Soon after news came of the February bill set to benefit California considerably, there was silence as to the question of, "Uh, exactly where will the money go?" You know there's a problem if, when offered money, an organization doesn't even know where to use it.

On April 3, the Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger issued Executive Order S-04-09, appointing Laura Chick, City Controller for Los Angeles, the ARRA Inspector General of the federal funds. Chick herself does have a record that includes monitoring and reporting instances of waste and fraud, so this should be an interesting ride ahead. According to a statement by the governor, Chick will be paid $175,000 per year in her new office.

"I am proud to announce this first-in-the-nation position that will make sure the funds we receive from the Recovery Act are used with accountability and transparency to stimulate our economy and create jobs," Schwarzenegger said. "Laura's impressive track record as a watchdog and public servant makes her uniquely qualified to ensure this funding is used as it was intended - to create jobs and help our state through this difficult economic time."

The governor's statement describes Chick's post as one in which she "will be watching for waste, fraud and abuse, and whether the estimated $50 billion in direct spending from the Recovery Act is used appropriately in California." Chick will review the California Recovery Task Force and "all funding that is funneled through the state as well as funding that is sent directly to cities, counties, school districts, non-profits or other entities over the coming two years."

According to Recovery.gov, the website set up the state to help illustrate the general direction of where stimulus funds will go (though specifics are not available), Health & Human Services is the big winner, with a planned $15.3 billion set to be diverted to that area; Education and Labor aren't far behind, set to see an estimated $11.8 and $8.4 billion each, respectively. (By April 9, news came of the governor's request for $5 billion in federal funding for public education. No word yet on whether that was to be a part of the $11.8 billion or not not.) Tax Relief is allotted none of the funding, while Public Safety is slated to receiving $0.3 billion. (California... earthquakes... anyone?)

One can only hope that at least part of this sizable windfall may be considered to help balance the more-than $40 billion budget deficit, rather than half-baked temporary fixes and exceptionally confusing measures, such as the Lottery Modernization Act.  

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

What Would YOU Do With $50 Billion?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us