Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Virginia Court Case Potentially Gives #NeverTrump Movement New Life

By Griffin Edwards

1-minute read

A July 11 federal court case in Richmond, Virginia, comes in the midst of much debate over delegate rules, and has the potential to turn the tables on Trump at the GOP convention.

Virginia RNC delegate Carroll Correll Jr., backed by the Citizens in Charge Foundation, sued Virginia Attorney General Mark Herrig and other state officials over delegate binding laws. Correll was successful in overturning rules that required delegates to vote winner-take-all, rather than proportionally. He hopes the ruling will aid GOP delegates who are hesitant to jump on the Trump train to vote their conscience at the national convention in Cleveland.

Lost? Let’s back up a second.

At the Republican National Convention, delegates from all 50 states, DC, and territories will come together to officially determine the Republican nominee. Delegates are typically required -- or “bound”-- to vote how state party rules tells them to, whether winner-take-all or proportionally.

So even if a delegate personally supports Cruz (for instance), if they’re “bound” to vote for Trump, they can’t vote for Cruz. Otherwise, under RNC Rule 16, their vote would be considered void.

In principle, the ruling says that states cannot enforce laws requiring delegates to vote winner-take-all, striking down a $2,500 fine for rebellious Virginia delegates. Instead, Correll asserts that proportional voting allows delegates to vote their conscience -- which Republicans were reportedly planning to do already.

That said, many GOP members are skeptical. Fox News quotes a Trump supporter who said, “It will have no impact on the Virginia delegation… Nor will it have any long-term ramification for Donald Trump’s quest for the nomination on the first ballot.”

But according to Correll, this is a “symbolic victory” that “morbidly humiliated” the Trump camp, as it could (conceivably) encourage more Republican delegates to vote against Trump at the convention -- a “delegate revolt” that is increasingly possible, but unlikely to succeed.

Delegate rules are under much scrutiny in the 2016 election, even within the major parties. As mainstream some Republicans explore their options for voting against Trump, many Democrats seek to rework rules regarding superdelegates -- in some states, going so far as to seek their abolition.

How the Correll court case will impact the RNC convention remains to be seen.

Photo Credit: uplift_the_world / Shutterstock.com

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  3. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  4. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  5. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  6. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  7. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  8. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  9. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  10. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Virginia Court Case Potentially Gives #NeverTrump Movement New Life

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us