Skip to content
Subscribe

Vanity Fair editor falls into partisan trap over Wall St reform

Published:

Vanity Fair's editor, Graydon Carter, laid out a compelling case for Wall St's hijacking of Washington DC.  Unfortunately, he allowed blatant partisanship to cloud his objectivity when evaluating the role of Senate Republicans in the battle for financial reform.

In his editorial, Mr. Carter presented a strong case for Wall St's virtually uncontested role in influencing DC lawmakers on matters related to regulation, transparency, and accountability in financial markets.  He called out the likes of Robert Rubin, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Citigroup.  He rightly pointed out that Wall St enjoyed a veritable boom after receiving the unprecedented taxpayer bailout, while stiffing struggling small businesses.  And he also rightly identified the clear-cut disparity between Wall St and Main St after the epic financial rescue.

Mr. Carter was also spot on when bringing to our attention that fact that Republican Senator Richard Shelby and Republican Senator Mitch McConnell have received substantial Wall St donations, while debating financial reform on the banking committee.

These are all well-supported facts.

However, Mr. Carter neglected to call out Democrats as well.  While Republicans have been soaking up Wall St donations in 2010, so have Democrats. According to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, of the $34 million given by the securities and investment industry in the 2010 election cycle, 62% has gone to Democrats and 37% to Republicans.

Leading Democratic Senators Chris Dodd and Charles Schumer have received nearly $10 million in Wall St donations over the last couple of decades.  Democratic Senators Harry Reid and Blanche Lincoln have held huge Wall St fundraisers this year.

President Obama received nearly $15 million from the securities and investment industry during his presidential campaign, and approximately $1 million from Goldman Sachs employees.

It is also worth noting that a strong Goldman Sachs connection currently exists in the Obama administration.

Greg Craig, Obama's first White House counsel, joined Goldman Sachs.  Rahm Emmanuel, Obama's White House Chief of Staff, was paid $35,000 as a consultant to Goldman Sachs while also working as Bill Clinton's top campaign fundraiser.  Warren Buffett, one of Obama's top economic advisers, is a staunch supporter of Goldman Sachs.  Mark Patterson, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner's Chief of Staff, was a Goldman Sachs lobbyist before joining the Treasury.  Gary Gensler, Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and Robert Hormats, Undersecretary of State for economic, energy, and agricultural affairs, both worked for Goldman Sachs before joining the Obama administration.

And let's not forget that current Obama economic adviser, Larry Summers, and former Clinton Treasury secretary, Goldman Sachs CEO, and Citigroup Chairman, Robert Rubin, were strong advocates for rolling back market regulations in the '90s.

So, instead of railing against Republicans, Mr. Carter should have been railing against both Republicans and Democrats. Emotionally-based partisanship only serves to entrench the two-headed, one-party monster.  Top levels of both parties have been stained by powerful corporate interests and Wall St lobbyists.  Both parties do the bidding of Goldman Sachs and the big banks.

Until Mr. Carter and other highly influential and intelligent individuals like him wake up to this fact and cast off the counter-productive fetters of blind partisanship, Main St will continue to suffer at the hands of party elites and Wall St banksters.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Vanity Fair editor falls into partisan trap over Wall St reform

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us