Skip to content
Subscribe

USDA Rule to Speed Up Poultry Inspections Concerns Food Safety Advocates

Published:

The 95 percent of Americans who eat chicken may want to take notice: the inspections regime for processing chickens and turkeys is likely to undergo major changes as the USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) pushes onward in its expansion of a pilot program that will apply to all of the country's poultry processing plants.

The inspections process known as the HACCP Based Models Project (HIMP) involves reducing the number of federal inspectors by as much as 40 percent and transfers more of that responsibility to the companies themselves. The new rule also allows for faster line speeds – up from 140 chickens per minute under the old rules to as many as 175, or nearly 3 per second. Turkeys would speed through lines at 55 rather than 45 birds per minute.

More than 9 billion chickens and 300 million turkeys are killed in the U.S. each year.One former inspector, Phyllis McKelvey,

told The Washington Post she fears that "the line speeds are so fast, they are not spotting contamination, like fecal matter, as the birds pass by."

The modernized HIMP process relies on other methods of sanitation.

“Their attitude is, let the chemicals do the work," McKelvey adds.

In an increasing number of plants, slaughtered chickens are bathed in several chemicals designed to kill pathogens like salmonella. To test whether the meat is safe for consumption, some birds are picked at random and placed in a solution to detect any residual pathogens. However, scientists question whether these solutions may be contaminating the samples and thus generating false results.

Consumer protection groups such as Food & Water Watch, the Consumer Federation of America, and the poultry inspectors’ union are asking the USDA to release the final version of the inspection rule to the public, which has thus far come under review -- and scrutiny -- from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) for relying on incomplete and outdated data.

The HIMP pilot program began in the late 1990s and has been under review after a 15-year trial period. Currently, 29 processing plants -- including 19 for chickens, 5 for turkeys, and 5 for hogs -- are participating in the program. If the final rule is approved, the new poultry inspection regime would go into effect for the nation's 239 chicken and 96 turkey processing facilities.

A review of the program came back with mixed results.

Participants experienced an increase in efficiency. Poultry companies are in favor of the HIMP regime: the industry expects to save more than $250 million annually if the final rule goes into effect.

However, an assessment of the pilot program in the hog industry has left food safety advocates concerned. Three of the 5 hog plants under HIMP were listed among the top 10 worst offenders of health and safety regulations. There are 608 hog plants nationwide.

Food safety advocates point to instances of contamination coming from countries that already allow processors to scale back their reliance on federal regulators.In 2012, for instance, a Canadian plant announced a recall of 2.5 million pounds of beef products sent to the United States because of an E. coli contamination. Also, nearly a dozen shipments of meat products from several Australian producers were intercepted by American authorities in recent years because they contained fecal matter and partly digested food, which can harbor deadly bacteria.

Critics of the inspection regime point to the risks to workers who experience various musculoskeletal disorders as a result of high-speed lines and who are also exposed to chemicals with undetermined effects. Inspectors across the country complain of developing rashes and breathing problems after working in some facilities.

A study conducted by the Southern Poverty Law Center found that 78 percent of federal inspectors feel less safe working in the new, fast-paced, chemical-intensive environments.

The final version of the rule is currently being reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Consumer groups are calling on the USDA to release the final version of the rule, which received over 175,000 public comments during the notice and comment stage. It is unclear what changes the FSIS made to its initial proposal following these comments.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

USDA Rule to Speed Up Poultry Inspections Concerns Food Safety Advocates

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us