Skip to content
Subscribe

Update: Make it Fair Initiative Signature Gathering Underway

Published:

UPDATE: We first wrote about the Make It Fair initiative back in October. It's the effort to repeal a business portion of Prop. 13. Now, Secretary of State Alex Padilla announced the signature gathering portion of the effort. Here is his statement:Secretary of State Alex Padilla announced the proponents of a new initiative were cleared to begin collecting petition signatures yesterday.The Attorney General prepares the legal title and summary that is required to appear on initiative petitions. When the official language is complete, the Attorney General forwards it to the proponent and to the Secretary of State, and the initiative may be circulated for signatures. The Secretary of State then provides calendar deadlines to the proponent and to county elections officials. The Attorney General’s official title and summary for the measure is as follows:REQUIRES CERTAIN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL REAL PROPERTY TO BE TAXED BASED ON FAIR-MARKET VALUE. DEDICATES PORTION OF ANY INCREASED REVENUE TO EDUCATION AND LOCAL SERVICES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Taxes certain commercial and industrial real property based on fair-market value—rather than, under current law, the purchase price with limited inflation. Exempts agricultural property and certain small businesses. Dedicates portion of any increased revenue to local services and to supplement, not replace, state’s minimum-fundingguarantee to schools. Provides tax exemption for $500,000 worth of tangible personal property used for business and all personal property used for certain small businesses. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Net increase in annual property tax revenues of $6.5 billion to $10.5 billion in most years, depending on the strength of real estate markets. After paying for county administrative costs and backfilling state income tax losses related to the measure, the remaining $6 billion to $10 billion would be allocated to schools (40 percent) and other local governments (60 percent). (17-0055.)The Secretary of State’s tracking number for this measure is 1851 and the Attorney General’s tracking number is 17-0055. The proponents of the measure Anthony Thigpenn, Helen Hutchison, and Benjamin McBride must collect the signatures of 585,407 registered voters (eight percent of the total votes cast for Governor in the November 2014 general election) in order to qualify it for the ballot. The proponents have 180 days to circulate petitions for the measure, meaning the signatures must be submitted to county elections officials no later than August 20, 2018. The proponents did not provide contact information.

ORIGINAL STORY:

Next year will mark the 40th anniversary of Proposition 13, the People's Initiative to Limit Property Taxation. Prop. 13 has decreased property taxes for residents and businesses by assessing property values at their 1975 value.

It also restricted annual increases of assessed property value to an inflation factor, not to exceed 2% per year.

Now, an effort is underway to undue a piece of the business benefit of Prop. 13.

While the effort is aimed at corporations, "Make it Fair" would have zero impact on residential property taxes.

The "Make it Fair" coalition, made a video featuring Robert Reich, the former economic advisor to President Clinton, Reich is now faculty at UC Berkeley and is the focal point of the Make it Fair video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICWx3I26An8

Make it Fair believes corporations have been taking advantage of the Prop. 13 business "loophole" and by consequence, property tax revenues for local governments and schools districts in California have suffered greatly.

GRASSROOTS PUSH

The group has been holding townhall meetings up and down the state, including this past week in Chula Vista. The group will hold their second townhall November 1st in San Diego.

The goal of the outreach is to educate the public on just how much money is, in their view, being lost to the Prop. 13 loophole. An economic study from USC claims it's $9 billion statewide and just over $800 million for San Diego County. That money, the group says, is badly needed for critical city services and school districts.

Chula Vista Councilmember Patricia Aguilar was on a panel for the Chula Vista event. She made the point, "Our local public safety organizations are desperate for money. Chula Vista has a severe police shortage and this consistent infusion of money would solve the staffing issues."

"Make it Fair" coalition members said any infusion of Prop. 13 money would go directly to local city services and school districts. It's not yet clear what the district breakdown would be.

The group will announce whether the initiative will go before voters in November 2018 in the coming months.

BUSINESS OUTCRY GROWING

Ask any business owner and they will tell you, California's business climate could use fewer regulations. They say it's hard enough to do business in the Golden State, and if the "Make it Fair" initiative is successful, it could decimate business opportunities. Indeed the state's business tax climate, according to the Tax Foundation is the third-worst in the nation.

In a story in Forbes, Economic advisor Rex Sinquefield writes, "Make It Fair's contention that loopholes in Proposition 13 allow a small number of 'giant corporations' and 'wealthy commercial property owners' to get around paying the property taxes that they could easily afford. In reality, though, the 'loopholes' that Make It Fair seeks to close are in place to protect residential and commercial real-estate owners at all places on the economic ladder. Their desired legislation (Senate Constitutional Amendment 5), which stalled in Sacramento, would create a steep tax increase for many property owners. That notion is unacceptable. Proposition 13 keeps small business owners’ doors open, even when the economy presents a variety of struggles – and it’s been providing this security for nearly 40 years."

The California Business Roundtable is beginning to mount their online ad campaign against the measure. Their language is very clear, “SCA 5 would dismantle the foundation of one of the most important propositions ever passed by voters.”

Stay tuned.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Update: Make it Fair Initiative Signature Gathering Underway

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us