Skip to content
Subscribe

The Tea Party considers military spending cuts

Published:

Most Tea Party-ers have always advocated government spending cuts, except when it comes to the Pentagon's budget. Now that the debt ceiling legislation has passed, activists in the Tea Party movement are calling on lawmakers to reduce military spending, as if they had all received a simultaneous upgrade to their Big Government-detecting radar. Pressure from Tea Party groups has even prompted Republican leaders in Congress to exclude any outstanding defense hawks from nomination to the newly created “Supercommittee.” What gives?

What could explain this sudden retreat by the liberty-lauding mainliners of the Tea Party to their ideological roots in the non-interventionist philosophies voiced by Ron Paul, whose 2008 campaign for president sparked the political organization of this – a third, more independent voice in American politics?

A better question to ask might be how the Tea Party strayed so far from its roots. In my view, it's become increasingly clear that the "mainstream" Tea Party isn't the ideological progeny of Dr. Paul and doesn't share the same truly conservative (what we would call today, Libertarian) values. Mainstreamers labeled themselves Tea Party members early on not because they found themselves to be disenfranchised Independents like many in Paul's base, but because they were tired of being disenfranchised Republicans who were threatened by a looming liberal takeover. Herein lies the fundamental difference: Paul's Tea Party is ideological and inclusive, harkening back to the “big-tent” times of the GOP, while the mainstream Tea Party is reactionary and exclusive, a straw man for neocon and neoliberals alike.

The bottom line is that a big tent philosophy doesn't profit a two-party system. However, the illusion of a third party does. No matter the talk from the Tea Party, or the angling by Republicans, you can bet the Military-Industrial Complex will be well-represented by our new Supercongress. And let's not forget that Democrats have proven themselves to be just as fond of wars as Republicans, especially domestic ones.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

The Tea Party considers military spending cuts

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us