Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Take the California Budget Challenge

By Susannah Kopecky

3-minute read

What would you do if you were asked to cut more than $18 billion out of the California budget? Many of our state legislators hem and haw at such a prospect, but you, the citizen at home, can make your views heard.

At the least, you can see where your views on spending and the budget align with your fellow citizen, by checking out the newest think tank tool to assess spending and taxing in California.


Budget-making is no longer reserved for the political elite… well, technically anyway. A small group of Californians proved the point this week after participating in a Mercury News poll, based off a project started by the group Next 10.  Next 10 was started by F. Noel Parry, a venture capitalist, and is “Focused on innovation and the intersection between the economy, the environment, and quality of life issues for all Californians.”

The group’s newest challenge asks regular Joes to act as legislators, and decide how to clamp down on a budget deficit of over $18 billion. As the Mercury News found out, some regular citizens were able to quickly understand the makeup of California’s budget, and promptly figure out ways to cut the spiraling deficit and keep the budget under control. The participants demonstrated their keen understanding of the basic necessities of running a state, with their involvement in the California Budget Challenge.


In the Mercury News version of the budget puzzle challenge, a number of individuals “Did in minutes what polarized Sacramento often can't do in months: They held their noses and made hard choices that sometimes conflicted with their core ideals.”

While not every participant was a pinnacle of tax-and-waste-busting success, what was seen was the high degree to which the average citizen understands government and the tough decisions that need to be made.  And unlike the state legislature, this bipartisan group of individuals did quickly come up with major plans to address a nearly-$20-billion deficit.

Interestingly, many Californians have already tried their hand at the survey from the comfort of the own homes, and a number of intriguing trends are noticeable, including a desire to start cutting down on some of the more bloated areas of state spending.


The Next 10 Budget Challenge asks visitors the deceptively simple question, “How will you balance the budget?”  The challenger is asked to briefly describe the demographic groups to which they belong, and how they would rate themselves politically.

Next, the challenger is shown a pie chart illustrating the state’s budget overview, paired with five questions about the budget, who helps craft it, and what the challenger should be aware of. Next, the challenger is taken through a series of questions asking them about specific areas of major spending, and whether they would cut that program’s budget, keep it the same, or increase it.

The categories include K-12 Education, Higher Education, Health and Human Services (including health care), Protecting the Environment, Criminal Justice, Jobs and Economic Security, Taxes, Sales Tax and Property Tax.


The great thing about this challenge is that it is informative, lets you know where you stand (in terms of population percentages which agree with you), and it’s even thought-provoking and fun! Anyone can say they would cut spending, but which areas would you be willing to sacrifice for the goal of a lowered deficit and a future of projected revenue in the black, rather than the red?

A number of interesting trends were shown, including that a majority of respondents favored enacting no additional legislation to curb greenhouse gases (47.9% of challengers).  Most respondents were not in favor of increasing eligibility for unemployment benefits (57.9% of respondents).  Only 5.3% of respondents were in favor of lowering the corporation tax, and nearly half of all respondents (47.8%) were in favor of reducing tax breaks such as the research and development credit.

The percentage of respondents who agreed with your choices is listed, as is a running total of your projected 5-year budget.


Perhaps our state legislators should take the Budget Challenge, and see how their views stack up. It could be informative.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Take the California Budget Challenge

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us