Skip to content
Subscribe

Supervisors Delay Elections Ballot Measure, Supporters Cry Foul

Published:

By a vote of 4-1, the San Diego County Board of Supervisors rejected the Fair Vote Participation Initiative for the November general election.

The measure, that would have mirrored Measure K in the City of San Diego, would have forced all county races to the general election, no matter if a candidate gets 50%+1 of the vote.

The measure had been cleared for the ballot after collecting enough valid signatures, but Republicans killed the measure. Termed-out Supervisor Ron Roberts voted against his colleagues.

Commission Study

The Supervisors decided to commission a study on how the initiative will impact county elections. It could go before voters in 2020, which political observers agree, gives Chairwoman Kristin Gaspar a better opportunity to retain her seat.

More voters participate in the general election than in the primary, that point is not disputed. Republicans believe, that due to voter demographics, moving the biggest decisions to the November General election favors Democrats, since more of their voters are participating.

Democrats Outraged

David Lagstein has been the point person in the effort to get the Fair Voter Participation Initiative on the ballot in November. He's an organizer with the local chapter of the SEIU.

In a statement Lagstein told IVN San Diego the Board of Supervisors violated state law, ""They violated state law by requiring an 'impact report' on our initiative, even though that provision of state law was only intended to be used when the legislative body has discretion in placing a matter on the ballot, and by requiring two readings before the board before placing it on the ballot, even though state law requires only one."

Lagstein continued, “Supporters of the FVPI are outraged by the incumbent Board of Supervisors complete disregard for the over 100,000 county voters who signed the initiative to ensure county officials are elected in November general elections when the most voters participate, not in very low turnout primary elections."

Lagstein called the county’s move a “blatant and illegal use of procedural shenanigans.” Labor is reportedly exploring all options to get the measure on the November ballot.

Rollercoaster Measure

The measure has been the subject of drama from Sacramento to San Diego.

As reported by IVN San Diego, the initial measure was drafted incorrectly. Then Assemblyman Todd Gloria applied a retroactive fix that was signed by Governor Jerry Brown.

County Registrar Michael Vu had to first suspend his count when the original drafting error was discovered, then following the fix of the measure, had to resume a recount in time for the Board of Supervisors to nix the measure for the ballot.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Supervisors Delay Elections Ballot Measure, Supporters Cry Foul

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us