Skip to content
Subscribe

Study: Breaking National Trends, CA's Top-Two Primary Increased Competition and Decreased Polarization

Published:

California is one of only a few states that has broken the trend of increased polarization, according to a report released earlier this year. And the most significant thing that separates California's elections from other states is the use of a nonpartisan top-two primary.

Open Primaries hosted a virtual discussion with Dr. Richard Barton, author of the Unite America Institute study titled, "“California’s Top-Two Primary: The Effects on Electoral Politics and Governance.” The report was published on the 13th anniversary of Top-Two's passage by California voters under Proposition 14 in June 2010.

Barton discussed a range of topics with regards to his study, which found that not only has California depolarized to a degree, but it is also one of only a few states that broke the trend of escalating polarization. It also saw increased electoral competition under a nonpartisan primary system.

It is not the only research that has come to this conclusion about Top-Two in California. Over the last decade, study after study after study have looked at voter participation, impact, electoral competition, and confidence in state government -- and they all come to the same conclusion:

Top-two has changed California elections to give voters greater accountability, better representation, and more competition -- particularly in the primaries where all voters and candidates, regardless of party affiliation, participate on the same ballot.

READ MORE: Unite America: California's Top-Two Primary Changed the Game for Better Elections

The passage of California's Proposition 14, authored by the Independent Voter Project, showed the nation what was possible, and Barton's study adds to the success story that has unfolded over the last decade and shows the potential of where Top Two can go not only in California, but in other states across the country.

Check out the full conversation with Dr. Barton above.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

Study: Breaking National Trends, CA's Top-Two Primary Increased Competition and Decreased Polarization

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us