Skip to content
Sign up free
News

So Is It Flooding or Drying?

By Susannah Kopecky

2-minute read

So is it time to stock up on bottled water, or to buy a raft?

It's hard work living in California. On nearly a daily basis, residents are told they will either continue to suffer from droughts, or are being told to prepare for the impending massive flood on the way. According to a March report by the Pacific Institute, around $100 billion dollars worth of coastline property is in danger of being washed away.

This and more, according to "The Impacts of Sea-Level Rise on the California Coast," released by the Pacific Institute, a Oakland-based think tank, which focused on climate change issues in its recent findings. The PI focuses on three main areas of thought: "Water, Community Strategies for Sustainability and Justice, and Globalization. In addition, the Institute focuses on four initiatives: International Water and Communities, Water Use in Business, Climate Impacts and Adaptation, and Integrity of Science."

According to the report, nearly 500,000 people are expected to be affected by rising sea levels along the California coastline. The report sounds the alarm that the state is in for a "1.4-meter sea-level rise - if no adaptation actions are taken."

The report hypothesizes that poorer residents and some minorities are more "vulnerable" to the possible changes ahead... if changes are not made. Note: keep in mind the words of the report's disclaimer: the report was funded by the EPA, the state Energy Commission, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the state Department of Transportation and the California Ocean Protection Council. These agencies "make no warrant, express or implied, and assume no responsibility or liability for the results of any actions taken or other information developed based on this paper, nor does any party represent that the uses of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights."

The Executive Summary of the report states that with climate change, the "mean sea level" will rise between 1 meter and 1.4 meters by 2100, owing to forecasted increased "flooding and erosion." With a 1.4 meter rise in sea level, 480,000 people will be "at risk of a 100 year flood event," particularly in Orange County, San Mateo County and Alameda County. The paper also finds that that "nearly $100 billion (in year 2000 dollars) worth of property... is at risk of flooding... if no adaptation actions are taken." According to the authors, about two thirds of the $100 billion in property is "concentrated" in the San Francisco Bay Area, the majority of which "is residential."

"Coastal armoring," or reinforcing, is projected to cost only $14 billion (again, "in year 2000 dollars"), while putting a stop to "continued developments in vulnerable areas" is another suggestion smiled upon.

The question does arise, however: with the growing population of California, would it not be more harmful to new residents, if there is a moratorium on coastline building, thus allowing for raised prices on the properties already there? (Supply and demand, supply and demand...) Being good environmental stewards is an important responsibility that goes with the benefit of living on the coast, but at what cost, one must wonder.









Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

So Is It Flooding or Drying?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us