Skip to content
Subscribe

San Diego Council District 3: Can a Democratic Homeless Advocate Unseat the Democratic Incumbent?

Coleen Cusack is an attorney and homeless advocate challenging Councilmember Stephen Whitburn for his seat representing residents of San Diego District 3, who live in downtown and near Balboa Park.

San Diego Council District 3: Can a Democratic Homeless Advocate Unseat the Democratic Incumbent?
Published:

Coleen Cusack is an attorney and homeless advocate challenging Councilmember Stephen Whitburn for his seat representing residents of San Diego District 3, who live in downtown and near Balboa Park.

In the City of San Diego, No Party Preference voters (NPPs) outnumber Republican voters – 24% to 22% – with Democratic registered voters accounting for 47% of the voting population.

Both Whitburn and Cusack are Democrats but it’s the former who has the advantage of incumbency and name ID, but Cusack has picked up some impressive endorsements and could challenge Whitburn on Election Day, especially if NPP voters rally in support of her.

The San Diego Union Tribune Editorial Board noted Whitburn is the clear favorite but then threw its support behind Cusack, saying she was particularly impressive in her endorsement interview. The newspaper said:

“She denounced how promises developers make on affordable housing are scaled back after city approvals are secured; expressed incredulity that the city had not made it a priority to prevent the closing of thousands of single-room occupancy units in recent years; and noted that prefab houses are available on Amazon for $23,000 at a time when government-subsidized housing routinely costs $500,000 or more. Cusack also makes a passionate case that criminalizing homelessness is ‘futile, expensive, counterproductive and cruel.’ She says the real goal of many leaders is swaying public perceptions, not solving problems,”

Whitburn counters:

“I am seeking reelection because I have led efforts to reduce homelessness, construct affordable housing and add neighborhood improvements, and I want us to keep moving forward. To reduce street homelessness, I opened two safe sleeping sites. They have security, restrooms, showers, meals and connections to housing. Over 500 people have moved off the streets and into these sites. I have led the way on adding truly affordable housing that limits rents to 30 percent of tenants’ incomes.”

Cusack: The Challenger

Cusack

Housing and homelessness, education, infrastructure, and personal safety are Cusack’s leading priorities, according to her campaign website. She is endorsed by numerous Democratic Clubs, Run Women Run, and homeless advocates.

“I am running as a 25-year resident of the district and 34-year resident of the city who never before aspired for political office. But lacking all faith and confidence in my elected representative, I am stepping up to do the job myself,” she said recently.

Whitburn: The Incumbent

Whitburn

Whitburn lists housing and homelessness and quality of life as his main priorities on his campaign website.

“Stephen successfully won passage of a new city law prohibiting encampments on public property when shelter beds are available. He opened safe sleeping sites, enabling people experiencing homelessness to move off the streets and into safe spaces offering security, restrooms, meals, and services. He also voted to create a rental assistance program that helps prevent homelessness altogether by enabling people to stay in their apartments,” his website says.

Whitburn is endorsed by the state and local Democratic Parties, labor groups, LGBTQ groups, and business groups.

What’s at stake?

Both candidates are Democrats, but the incumbent is known to frequently support Mayor Gloria and the mayor’s policy initiatives. It’s unlikely the mayor would want to lose that support, so look for him and the local Democratic Party to campaign heavily for Whitburn.

The winner wins the seat that represents downtown San Diego and surrounding urban neighborhoods, all grappling with the homeless crisis.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

San Diego Council District 3: Can a Democratic Homeless Advocate Unseat the Democratic Incumbent?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us