Skip to content
Sign up free
Election Reform

Richmond, Calif. Will Vote on Ranked Choice Voting in November

Richmond, Calif. Will Vote on Ranked Choice Voting in November
Photo by Getty Images on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by author.

The Richmond City Council unanimously approved a ballot measure for November in a 5-0 vote that authorizes the use of ranked choice voting (RCV) for mayor and city council elections. 

By Shawn Griffiths

3-minute read

The Richmond City Council unanimously approved a ballot measure for November in a 5-0 vote that authorizes the use of ranked choice voting (RCV) for mayor and city council elections.

If approved by voters, the only barriers to implementing RCV would be financial and technical adjustments by the Contra Costa County Registrar of Voters.

The ballot question was written with this in mind:

"Shall the City of Richmond Charter be amended to authorize use of instant runoff voting, also known as ranked choice voting, to allow Richmond voters to rank Mayor and City Council election candidates in order of preference on their ballots, which voting system would be implemented once it becomes technically and financially feasible through the Contra Costa County Registrar of Voters and upon adoption of an implementing ordinance by the Richmond City Council?”

RCV is already used in several jurisdictions in California, including Albany, Berkeley, Oakland, San Francisco, San Leandro, and will soon be implemented in Eureka and Redondo Beach.

It has also previously been approved by voters in Davis, Ojai, and Santa Clara County -- which could soon switch to its use after the California Legislature approved a bill that allows the county to use RCV.

The Richmond Reform Act

Richmond voters will have two reform measures on the ballot. Along with the RCV measure, the Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder-Elections Department certified an initiative called the Richmond Reform Act.

The Richmond Reform Act would amend the city's charter to require municipal primaries in which a candidate could win an election outright if they get 50%+1 of the vote.

If no candidate gets a majority, then the top two candidates move on to a general election.

Richmond currently has plurality elections, which means a candidate does not need over 50% of the vote to win. They can win an election even when a majority of voters cast their ballot for someone else.

Mayor Eduardo Martinez, for example, won his last election with 39.20% of the vote.

The Richmond Reform Act creates two scenarios: A candidates could win outright in primary elections, which historically do not have turnouts anywhere near as high as November general elections.

OR, no candidate gets a majority in the primary and general election voters choose between two candidates in November.

It is not uncommon for cities to have this type of election model. San Diego, for example, used it until voters approved Measure K in 2016 which required all local races to have a general election.

Measure K was sponsored by the Independent Voter Project which asserted that the "50%+1" rule was easily exploited by political insiders and special interest groups to have the most influence in elections.

Put simply, putting up a candidate that can rely on name ID alone can be enough to win an election before most voters have a chance to participate.

Two years after Measure K was approved at the city-level, San Diego County voters approved Measure D to ditch the "50%+1" rule at the county level as well.

Another Option to Get Majority Outcomes

Both RCV and the Richmond Reform Act guarantee majority winners. However, there are important differences for voters to consider.

RCV advocates argue their reform can avoid the expense of an additional election while also offering general election voters the full slate of candidates.

Under RCV, voters have the option to rank candidates in order of preference. If no candidate gets over 50% of first choice selections, an instant round of runoff is triggered.

The last place candidate is eliminated, and their voters' next choices are applied to the results. This process repeats as needed until a candidate has at least 50%+1 of the vote.

Voters rank candidates in the order they would vote for them if their higher choice was not in the race so multiple rounds of runoff can be held without another election.

In other words, the reform offers a majority outcome without sacrificing voter participation or choice.

If approved by voters, the city would have to coordinate with county officials to work out the cost and administration of an RCV election

Due to the county not being ready for RCV elections right now, it is possible that it may take more than one election cycle to implement.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Richmond, Calif. Will Vote on Ranked Choice Voting in November

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us